Shafqat Husain case

Published March 15, 2015

THE course adopted by the country in executing prisoners on death row is deeply problematic, to say the least. While ending the moratorium on the death penalty in cases involving terrorism caused much consternation among rights groups, lifting the bar in its entirety has opened the floodgates of the miscarriage of justice, particularly given that the flaws in and faults of the justice system are all too evident. This is vividly illustrated in the case of Shafqat Husain, currently incarcerated at the Karachi Central Prison; the warrants for the execution of the 23-year-old have been issued for March 19. However, this may be a travesty of justice; human rights organisations are pointing out that he was around 14 years old at the time of the commission of the crime. Pakistan’s obligation under the international Convention of the Rights of the Child means that the death sentence cannot be handed down to those who were underage at the time the crime was committed. Further, there are grounds to believe that his confession was extracted under torture. On Friday, the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan raised these points in calling upon the prime minister and the interior minister to intervene to save Husain’s life. The letter points out that in January, the interior minister “had announced that an inquiry would be conducted by the ministry ... No such inquiry has taken place and Shafqat is now headed for the gallows....”

This case can prove a litmus test for the government’s commitment to the ideals of justice. Husain’s case deserves being considered through a humane lens but the fact is that the matter goes far beyond that. Was the stay on executions a considered move, as a result of which real chances were calculated of bringing militancy under control — even though statistics show that capital punishment is no deterrent to murder? Or was it a knee-jerk reaction to assuage the anger of a nation that has suffered too much? It is the fate of cases such as that of Husain that will decide.

Published in Dawn, March 15th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...