IHC seeks AGP's opinion on admissibility of Zahid Hamid's petition

Published December 8, 2014
Zahid Hamid. — Photo courtesy: Pakistan Council for Science and Technology.
Zahid Hamid. — Photo courtesy: Pakistan Council for Science and Technology.

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Monday issued a notice to Attorney General of Pakistan and has asked for his opinion on December 12 regarding a petition filed by Zahid Hamid against a special court order terming him ‘abettor’ in the Musharraf treason case.

The bench headed by Justice Athar Minallah resumed the hearing over a petition filed by the former minister for science and technology and also upheld the objections which were put on Hamid's petition by the Islamabad High Court registrar.

Giving his remarks Justice Minallah said the powers of the special court were equal to that of high court. He added that the interim order of a special court could not be challenged in a high court.

The court sought the opinion of Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt on whether the petition submitted by Zahid Hamid was admissible or not and adjourned the next hearing until December 12.

Zahid Hamid, the erstwhile federal minister for science and technology, has challenged a special court verdict that ordered the government to include him as one of the abettors in the treason case against former military ruler Pervez Musharraf.

In his petition before the Islamabad High Court, Mr Hamid – who was the law minister in Musharraf’s cabinet when the former military ruler imposed a state of emergency on November 3, 2007 – not only distanced himself from the act itself, but also insisted on a ‘solo trial’ for his former boss.

Mr Hamid had resigned from his cabinet position when the special court ordered he be tried as an abettor, on Nov 21. The order also implicated former prime minister Shaukat Aziz and former chief justice Abdul Hameed Dogar.

A petition filed through his counsel, Khawaja Haris Ahmed, has been placed before the IHC. But the registrar’s office has raised certain objections on the petition, arguing that the high court lacks jurisdiction to hear this matter. However, the petition has been fixed before Justice Athar Minallah as an ‘objection case’.

Opinion

Editorial

Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...
Wheat protests
Updated 01 May, 2024

Wheat protests

The government should withdraw from the wheat trade gradually, replacing the existing market support mechanism with an effective new one over the next several years.
Polio drive
01 May, 2024

Polio drive

THE year’s fourth polio drive has kicked off across Pakistan, with the aim to immunise more than 24m children ...
Workers’ struggle
Updated 01 May, 2024

Workers’ struggle

Yet the struggle to secure a living wage — and decent working conditions — for the toiling masses must continue.