Militant currency

Published November 16, 2014
This image posted on a militant website on Thursday, Nov. 13, 2014, which has been verified and is consistent with other AP reporting, shows renderings of new coins that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State group, ordered the group to start minting for its own currency -AP
This image posted on a militant website on Thursday, Nov. 13, 2014, which has been verified and is consistent with other AP reporting, shows renderings of new coins that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State group, ordered the group to start minting for its own currency -AP

The self-styled Islamic State has added another ‘achievement’ to its tally as it seeks to meet the criteria that define a modern functioning state.

The extremist group reportedly intends to mint its own coins as per the diktat of ‘caliph’ al-Baghdadi. IS already has a central leader, a flag and a de facto capital — Raqqah in Syria — while it controls several provinces in that country as well as in Iraq.

Add to this the hordes of well-armed cadres that constitute its militant army.

All these facts underscore the threat IS poses to the Middle East as it seeks to remake the region in its own image. Perhaps all that remains for IS to be considered a ‘genuine’ country is issuing its own passports and postage stamps. Yet, seriously speaking, the fact is that the group is probably the most well-financed of all contemporary militant outfits, even if the new coins are little more than a gimmick.

Read: IS to ‘mint own coins’

So while the US-led military campaign against the group — which has had mixed results — continues, the international community also needs to come up with practical ways to cut off the Islamic State’s finances.

It needs to be identified who is buying oil from fields under IS control and who is facilitating the group’s financial transactions. Because while it may be trumpeting its own legal tender, the militant group still very much does business in dollars, euros and Iraqi dinars.

As far as aspirations of becoming a functioning state go, in the age of empire it was possible for marauding hordes to occupy a country and then claim legitimacy over it.

But in the modern era, it is the will of the people that grants governments legitimacy and determines the redrawing of national borders.

Considering the reports from those living under IS rule — as the UN has recently highlighted — the ‘caliphate’ has unleashed a reign of terror in the territories it controls. Hence any dreams of legitimacy will remain unfulfilled if people continue to be terrorised in the name of faith.

Published in Dawn, November 16th, 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Privatisation divide
Updated 14 May, 2024

Privatisation divide

How this disagreement within the government will sit with the IMF is anybody’s guess.
AJK protests
14 May, 2024

AJK protests

SINCE last week, Azad Jammu & Kashmir has been roiled by protests, fuelled principally by a disconnect between...
Guns and guards
14 May, 2024

Guns and guards

THERE are some flawed aspects to our society that we must start to fix at the grassroots level. One of these is the...
Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...