And now Facebook

Published November 8, 2014
.—Illustration by William Banzai
.—Illustration by William Banzai

THE release of Facebook’s latest Government Requests Report has laid bare the Pakistani government’s priorities when it comes to the internet. Requests from the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority and IT ministry to restrict content on the social network increased nearly tenfold in January-June 2014, as compared to the previous six months.

Additionally, the report cited 116 government requests to access data from user accounts, of which 35.34pc resulted in the production of ‘some’ data.

Even this limited glimpse into the dialogue between Facebook and the state reveals that the regressive block-and-ban policies that continue to prevent our access to YouTube are now being applied to the biggest social network in local cyberspace, with Facebook complicit in the act of censorship.

Also read: Analysis: What you cannot see on Facebook

Equally worrying is the fact that Pakistan’s over 17 million local Facebook users may have their privacy invaded by state agencies based on the cases put forward, and Facebook’s understanding of local laws such as the controversial Protection of Pakistan Act.

Similar to the YouTube ban, this censorship and invasion of privacy appears impossible to challenge. There is no notice from either Facebook or the government. There is no transparency in the process, no mechanisms to redress or challenge actions taken by either party.

The ‘deal’ between Facebook and the state remains unknown, despite the fact that basic rights — access to information, free speech, privacy — are being trampled upon.

The lack of transparency and accountability also leaves this clandestine system open to misuse and abuse, especially given the government’s track record in cyberspace so far, and Facebook’s limited understanding of Pakistan.

While extremist outfits organise freely and spread hate speech on Facebook, the few identified content restrictions have all targeted liberal, progressive voices such as the rock band Laal whose Facebook page was banned. With this seemingly ad hoc, arbitrary process of censorship, the government can hardly regain public trust.

It can only do so by making its actions in conjunction with Facebook public, and fulfilling its promise to open YouTube in the near future.

Published in Dawn, November 8th , 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...