LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Monday gave a ruling that decisions of election tribunals could not be challenged before high court.

Justice Ijazul Ahsan gave the ruling, dismissing two petitions of PML-N MPAs for being non-maintainable.

In the first petition, Mohsin Latif, a returned candidate from PP-147 Lahore, pleaded that his opponent, Shoaib Siddiqui, had filed a petition against his victory before the election tribunal. He said Mr Siddiqui had attached unattested documents with the petition which was not permitted under the law. He said the tribunal should have dismissed Siddiqui’s petition but it had not done so.

In the second petition, Shaukat Cheema stated that he had won election from PP-104 but his opponent approached the election tribunal and accused him of holding a fake graduation degree.

Dismissing both the petitions, the judge remarked that LHC Multan bench had already declared that the high court was not the competent forum against election tribunals’ decisions as only the Supreme Court could entertain such petitions.

METRO BUS: The Lahore High Court disposed of a petition against acquisition of a land for the Metro Bus System track allegedly without fulfilling prerequisites and paying compensation to the petitioner. Appearing before the court, Lahore Commissioner Rashid Mahmood Langrial said the government had not acquired the petitioner’s property but he had already sold out shops constructed on his land. He said 19-marla land in front of shops was being used for parking. In light of the commissioner’s reply, the court disposed of the petition.

Petitioner Zameer Husain had contended that the government had acquired his land to construct MBS bridge-track on Qartaba Chowk, Mozang.

BA/BSc (Hons): A Lahore High Court division bench allowed holders of BA/BSc (honours) and BS degrees for admission to LLB.

The bench was hearing a petition of an FC College’s student Shehraiz Asghar.

The petitioner said he had obtained four-year BS (honours) degree from the Punjab University but he had been disqualified for admission to LLB. He said the act of the university was discriminatory and in violation of fundamental rights protected in the Constitution.

Legal adviser to the university told the bench that a notification had been issued, declaring BSc/BA (honours) degree holders eligible for LLB course. At this, the court disposed of the petition.

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...