US has not refused Pakistan’s request for defence equipment

Published April 2, 2014
US State Department building in Washington DC. — File Photo
US State Department building in Washington DC. — File Photo

WASHINGTON: The United States has not refused Pakistan's request for excess defence articles (EDA) from its worldwide pool, the State Department said while citing Washington's continued security cooperation with the key South Asian country.

“To be clear, the United States has not refused Pakistan's request regarding EDA sourced from the worldwide pool - to include any request that might involve mine-resistant ambush protected vehicles (MRAPs),” office of the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson's remarks came in response to a series of questions raised at the daily briefing about reports on possible provision of MRAPs to Pakistan.

The spokesperson noted that the United States “continues to assist Pakistan through many security cooperation programmes to build partnership capacity, including through the provision of worldwide available EDA.”

“The United States is currently reviewing Pakistan's request for EDA sourced from the worldwide available EDA pool,” the spokesperson said. For details regarding the specifics of Pakistan's request, the spokesperson directed reporters to the government of Pakistan.

However, the spokesperson added: “We note we have not and do not intend to transfer EDA from Afghanistan to any of its neighbouring countries, including Pakistan.”

Military equipment that has been determined to be excess can be made available through the worldwide excess defence articles (EDA) programme, which is open to all eligible countries, including Afghanistan and Pakistan, the spokesperson explained.

A number of countries including Pakistan routinely request EDA through our worldwide EDA programme, the State Department said.

EDA may come from many places around the world where the designated department of defence implementing agency has excess equipment.

Much of this equipment is currently at depots in the continental United States.

All EDA is provided “as is, where is” meaning recipient countries are responsible for the transportation and any needed refurbishment costs for all EDA transfers.

The State Department also elaborated that the US military equipment leaving overland from Afghanistan through Pakistan or via the Northern Distribution Network is part of the overall process of removing equipment as American forces draw down in Afghanistan.

“We have not and do not intend to transfer this equipment to the governments neighbouring Afghanistan.”

Washington's decisions on worldwide EDA transfers “involve a thorough and deliberate review that considers the needs of potential recipients, our mutual national security needs, the ability of the recipient to sustain the equipment, and other factors,” the spokesperson said.

The State Department works with the Department of Defence to identify recipients for excess defence articles.

“The State Department retains final statutory approval,” and “reviews each EDA request carefully.”

Opinion

Editorial

Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...
Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...