UN rejects Russian annexation of Crimea

Published March 27, 2014
Ukraine  Ambassador Yuriy Sergeyev, left, and Ukraine's acting Foreign Minister Andrii Deshchytsia, right, listen to speakers after the UN General Assembly voted and approved a draft resolution on the territorial integrity of the Ukraine, Thursday, March 27, 2014 at United Nations Headquarters. – AP Photo
Ukraine Ambassador Yuriy Sergeyev, left, and Ukraine's acting Foreign Minister Andrii Deshchytsia, right, listen to speakers after the UN General Assembly voted and approved a draft resolution on the territorial integrity of the Ukraine, Thursday, March 27, 2014 at United Nations Headquarters. – AP Photo

UNITED NATIONS: The UN General Assembly on Thursday adopted a Western-backed resolution declaring Crimea's breakaway referendum illegitimate and refusing to recognise Russia's annexation of the peninsula.

The non-binding resolution passed with a comfortable majority in the 193-member body, with 100 votes in favour and 11 votes against. More than 20 countries did not vote.

Ukraine, which drafted the resolution, had urged the international community to back the text, hoping an overwhelming show of support would ward off further Russian intervention on its territory.

“I am convinced that a strong vote today will help to deter further aggressive moves,” acting Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Deshchytsya told the assembly.

“It sends an essential message that the international community will not allow what has happened in Crimea to set a precedent to further challenges to our rules,” he added.

Western diplomats wanted a strong majority vote to press home what they say is Russia's isolation, but there had been fears that a high number of countries would abstain.

The resolution garnered more support than a similar text passed in 2009 over the Georgia crisis.

Ukraine submitted the draft resolution, writing the text in moderate language in the hope of attracting a maximum number of votes, and it makes no direct reference to Russia.

The text is similar to a US-drafted resolution submitted to the Security Council on March 19, which Russia vetoed. China abstained and the other 13 members of the council voted in favor.

Thursday's resolution repeats that the March 16 referendum in Crimea has “no validity” and asks countries not to recognise any alteration of the status of the Black Sea peninsula.

It calls on all states to refrain from any attempts to modify Ukraine's borders through the threat or use of force or other unlawful means and calls for dialogue to resolve the crisis.

Ukraine said Thursday that a vote for the resolution was a vote for the UN charter, while a vote against or an abstention undermined it.

“One month has cost us dearly. More inaction may cost us this organisation,” he added.

The United States backed Ukraine's request and criticized Russia.

US ambassador Samantha Power told the assembly it was “disheartening in the extreme to see Russia carry on as if Ukrainians have no legitimate interest in Crimea.”

“Ukraine is justified in seeking our votes in reaffirming and protecting its borders,” Power said.

“We urge you to vote yes on a resolution that enshrines the centrality of territorial integrity and that calls for a diplomatic not a military solution to this crisis,” she said.

Russia stuck to its position, saying it had no right to refuse support to Crimeans in their right to self-determination.

“For several centuries,” Russian ambassador Vitaly Churkin told the assembly, Crimea was “an integral part of our country.”

“Only an arbitrary decision by the USSR to transfer it to Ukraine upset this natural state of affairs,” he said.

The 11 countries that voted against the text were Armenia, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, North Korea, Russia, Nicaragua, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe.

Nato and Western powers voted overwhelmingly in favour. Among the abstentions were Afghanistan, China, India and Pakistan, as well many South American nations.

Israel and Iran were among those that did not vote.

Opinion

Political capitalism

Political capitalism

Pakistani decision-makers salivate at the prospect of a one-party state but without paying attention to those additional ingredients.

Editorial

Spending restrictions
Updated 13 May, 2024

Spending restrictions

The country's "recovery" in recent months remains fragile and any shock at this point can mean a relapse.
Climate authority
13 May, 2024

Climate authority

WITH the authorities dragging their feet for seven years on the establishment of a Climate Change Authority and...
Vending organs
13 May, 2024

Vending organs

IN these cash-strapped times, black marketers in the organ trade are returning to rake it in by harvesting the ...
A turbulent 2023
Updated 12 May, 2024

A turbulent 2023

Govt must ensure judiciary's independence, respect for democratic processes, and protection for all citizens against abuse of power.
A moral victory
12 May, 2024

A moral victory

AS the UN General Assembly overwhelmingly voted on Friday in favour of granting Palestine greater rights at the...
Hope after defeat
12 May, 2024

Hope after defeat

ON Saturday, having fallen behind Japan in the first quarter of the Sultan Azlan Shah Cup final, Pakistan showed...