Military intervention

Published February 27, 2014

SINCE the 2008 elections, parliamentary democracy in the country has been strengthened by politicians who have stood united against any hint of extra-constitutional intervention. Though the political class can be accused of indecisiveness when it comes to taking hard decisions, years of military dictatorship and army interference in civilian affairs have taught it why democratic values need to be cherished. It is saddening then that MQM chief Altaf Hussain should call for army intervention in the event of the government not backing the military’s fight against the Pakistani Taliban. True, the outlawed group has committed horrendous acts of terror across the country. Thousands, including soldiers and ordinary civilians, have died in the bloodbath. Schools, mosques, markets and security installations have all been targeted, and there can be no divergence from the view that militancy in the country must be uprooted, and its perpetrators brought to justice. But surely, it is the elected representatives of the people who should lead the way and make decisions which the army must obey. It is a fact that no strategy against the militants would be complete without input from the military, but in any democracy worth its salt, the final decision rests with those in parliament.

Mr Hussain’s own party has, more than once, been at the receiving end of operations conducted by both the military and civilian law enforcers. So it is ironical that he should call for military intervention. The argument he has used, that the country is more important than democracy, cannot be sustained in the light of history. Military regimes have weakened rather than strengthened the country. One dictator abrogated an earlier constitution. Two others mauled the current one beyond recognition, and it took approximately a decade in each case before the elected assemblies were able to recast the basic law in its original mould. Mr Hussain’s party has sizeable representation in the national and provincial assemblies, and such utterances send out the wrong message to anti-constitutional forces lurking in the wings. It is the Taliban who want to see the Constitution jettisoned; mature political parties should not be seen to even imply this, even if their argument is different.

Opinion

Editorial

Pakistan’s moment
Updated 20 Jun, 2026

Pakistan’s moment

Pakistan’s diplomats are second to none, and if these states seek to engage this country constructively, a new modus vivendi for the subcontinent can be reached.
Menacing water plans
20 Jun, 2026

Menacing water plans

IN April last year, India suspended the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty, which contains no provision allowing it to...
World Refugee Day
20 Jun, 2026

World Refugee Day

WORLD Refugee Day, observed today around the globe, marks 75 years since the adoption of the 1951 convention ...
Digital deal
19 Jun, 2026

Digital deal

THINGS have moved rapidly where the Iran-US memorandum of understanding is concerned. While the physical document ...
Failing the public
19 Jun, 2026

Failing the public

WHETHER it is Sindh’s struggle to secure clean drinking water or Balochistan’s difficulty in improving the...
Crushed lives
19 Jun, 2026

Crushed lives

COURTS and commissions have often been up in arms over the health and ecological hazards associated with...