THE government of Sindh, under the guidance of the chief minister, has decided to opt for the rehabilitation of the Sukkur Barrage instead of replacing it.

The lone voice of Syed Khurshid Ahmed Shah, leader of the opposition in the National Assembly, had been demanding an altogether new barrage, but sense prevailed as an experienced team of engineers and structural experts from Sindh and Punjab decided on the basis of a feasibility report prepared by the original builders -- the United Kingdom.

All the experts unanimously ruled out immediate structural threat to the Sukkur barrage that was completed in nine years’ record time (1923-1932) on the instructions of the then governor of Bombay Sir George Ambrose Lloyd.

The funds required for building a new barrage is estimated to be over Rs200 billion which is unavailable. Even if it is arranged by hook or by crook, the structure would hardly withstand the onslaught of seepage.

The cause of damage to the barrage is not that it has crossed an expiry date, as claimed by leader of the opposition. There have been many other factors, including indifference on the part of the authorities responsible for its maintenance, which has been mainly responsible for causing immense damage to it.

It may be recalled that huge iron doors of the barrage fell into the river about 25-30 years ago as they were completely rusted despite the fact that millions of rupees were shown on paper every year to have been spent on applying anti-rust paint on its iron doors.

I remember when the news of the ‘falling doors’ of Sukkur barrage appeared in the electronic and print media, the Britons offered to replace the damaged doors free of cost. They came to Pakistan and did an excellent job.

I earnestly request the chief minister of Sindh to entrust the rehabilitation work of the barrage to the UK. I am sure British engineers will do their best to carry out the repair work to their satisfaction and also to the satisfaction of the people of Pakistan, especially the tillers and farmers of Sindh.

INAYAT BALOCH
Hyderabad

Updated Dec 10, 2013 07:47am

More From This Section

Calling from abroad

I HAVE been experiencing great difficulty in making telephone calls to Pakistan these days. The quality of sound is...

Noise pollution

MODERN research has shown that the level of noise above a certain limit is harmful to our health and is responsible...

Pakistani bonds

THIS refers to recent news reports on Pakistan bonds. I think the issue was good news for US fund managers. Most of...

Killing bustards

IT is unfortunate that a dignitary from a Muslim state could come over and kill 2,100 of our precious and protected...

Comments (1) (Closed)


aqeel
Dec 11, 2013 04:54am

In my personal view, there must be a government department for assessing the projects, and writing you mind of who to give the whole project to is probably against the transparency. Which ever organization bids better and is more capable should be awarded the project. British are not the only nation that ever build barrages in the world, so lets keep an open mind.