Missing persons case: IG FC issued contempt of court notice

Published December 5, 2013
The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Ijaz Shahid to appear before it on Dec 5 or face contempt charges.—File Photo
The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Ijaz Shahid to appear before it on Dec 5 or face contempt charges.—File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday served a contempt of court notice to the inspector general of the Frontier Corps (FC) for not complying with its order in a case relating to the 'missing persons' of Balochistan.

This is the first time that a serving general has been issued a contempt of court notice. The court had previously warned IG FC Maj-Gen Ijaz Shahid that he may face contempt charges if he fails to appear before it on Dec 5.

During proceedings today, Attorney General Irfan Qadir appeared in court as counsel for Maj-Gen Shahid. However, the court said that the IG FC would not be given any leverage as long as he refuses to appear in court himself.

Heading the three-judge bench, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry said that the IG FC should physically appear in court and explain his reasons for not obeying the orders of the court.

The chief justice directed the secretary interior to issue a notice to Maj-Gen Shahid and ensure his presence in court.

In a parrallel case relating to disappearance of one Yasin Shah and similar enforced disappearances, the federal government was yet again unable to present the remaining missing persons. Defence Minister Khwaja Asif pleaded the three-judge bench of the apex court for further time to produce the victims. However, the court rejected the plea.

The Supreme Court had given the government a final deadline of Thursday to produce the 33 missing persons.

The chief justice remarked that the court should summon somebody else if the defence minister was helpless.

Asif told the bench that the whereabouts of five to seven missings persons had been ascertained, but he was unable to reveal that information in public and requested an in-camera hearing.

Responding to the request, the chief justice asked the defence minister to first produce the 30 missing persons and then an in-camera briefing would be held in the judge’s chamber.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.