An overview of Islamic banking
By Syed Imad-ud-Din Asad
ISLAMIC banking signifies banking operations that comply with provisions given in the fundamental Islamic texts. While some of these norms are shared by Islamic and western financial systems, certain norms are exclusive to Islam.
In fact, some Islamic banking restrictions are severe enough to render certain western banking practices and transactions absolutely void. Prohibition of riba and gharar are two of the main restrictions imposed by the Quran and the Sunnah. Most of the present-day Islamic scholars agree that riba, which literally means “an excess”, includes both usury and interest. The prohibition of riba is generally considered to be the most important of all Islamic banking principles. Gharar signifies ambiguity, uncertainty, or lack of specificity in the terms of a financial contract.
As riba is prohibited, suppliers of capital become investors instead of creditors. Also, investment can only be made in permitted commodities and activities. For instance, one cannot deal in the import and export of alcohol. Similarly, it is not allowed to invest in a casino.
Based on the above-mentioned principles, there is a variety of Islamic banking instruments and transactions in vogue. Musharaka is a business structure in which the bank not only makes a financial contribution to the enterprise, but may also participate in managing the venture. Profits are shared between the parties according to a pre-determined ratio, and losses are borne by them in proportion to their capital contributions. In terms of classification, this is an equity-based transaction.
In mudaraba, the bank provides the requisite financial resources, but does not participate in managing the enterprise. It is a form of partnership in which one party provides the funds while the other provides expertise and management. Profits are divided among the parties according to a mutually agreed ratio. Financial losses are borne by the investor alone. This is also an equity-based transaction.
Murabaha is an arrangement in which the bank, instead of advancing a loan to the client wishing to purchase certain goods or equipment, purchases the items and sells them to the client at cost plus a declared profit.
In tawarruq, the bank buys an asset and immediately sells it to the client on a deferred payment basis. The client then sells the same to a third party for immediate delivery and payment. Consequently, the client receives a cash amount and has a deferred payment obligation for the marked-up price to the bank. The asset is typically a metal, like copper or platinum.
Ijarah is the leasing or hiring of a physical asset, and it is one of the fastest growing activities of Islamic banks. It must be mentioned that some of the transactions and instruments are not considered to be in conformity with Islamic law by all Muslim scholars. Those opposing these practices do so by pointing out the hidden or concealed elements of riba and gharar in them. For example, actual administrative fee is one thing and interest in the name of administrative fee is another.
In fact, every bank conducting Islamic operations has a committee of Muslim scholars, called the “Sharia committee”, that determines whether a product or practice complies with Islamic law. As there is no set of binding uniform rules, Sharia committees, at times, give conflicting rulings. There can also be a difference between two countries or regions. For instance, in Malaysia, Islamic banking restrictions are interpreted more liberally than in the Gulf.
Another shortcoming confronting Islamic banking is the shortage of qualified professionals. There are not many people who are equally skilled in conventional banking and Islamic law. A person well acquainted with conventional banking can easily understand any Islamic product; however, one cannot develop or market such a product without knowing the rules and logic unique to Islam.
To summarise, lack of uniformity in laws and procedures, and deficiency of skilled professionals are among the main hurdles faced by Islamic banks and their clients. However, the industry is growing — the Arab oil money being one of the main driving forces. This is evident not only from the number of banks established specifically for practising Sharia-compliant finance, but also from the increasing number of western or conventional banks engaging in such operations.
The writer is a graduate of Harvard Law School and specialises in Islamic finance. syed_asad@post.harvard.edu


Cuba’s reintegration
By Patricia Grogg
CUBA’S reintegration into Latin America means that the government of Raúl Castro will be celebrating the 50th anniversary of the revolution in a wholly different regional context than the one that prevailed in the 1960s, when this Caribbean island nation was marginalised by practically all of Latin America.
2008 has been a very productive year for Cuban diplomacy, and the string of successes is expected to continue in 2009, with several Latin American heads of state visiting Havana, including Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa and Argentine President Cristina Fernández in January, followed by their Chilean counterpart Michelle Bachelet in February, and Mexican leader Felipe Calderón on a date to be decided.
Raúl Castro’s choice of Venezuela and Brazil as the destinations of his first official trips as Cuban president, following his appointment in February 2008, is an indication that he is steering his administration down the path of Latin American and Caribbean integration, while continuing with a foreign policy focused on relations with China and Russia, the successor to the Soviet Union.
In Brazil, Cuba was officially admitted as a full member of the Rio Group — a political discussion and coordination forum involving 21 countries of the region — which convened an extraordinary meeting during the first Latin American and Caribbean Summit on Integration and Development, held Dec. 16-17 in the northeastern Brazilian state of Bahia.
Cuba’s admission to the Rio Group and the fact that it was invited to participate in the first regional summit held without US involvement, where it also secured a condemnation of Washington’s nearly five-decade trade embargo on Cuba, strengthens the Cuban government’s stance against a possible reinstatement into the Organisation of American State (OAS).
For some analysts, the next step towards achieving complete regional integration would require dismantling the OAS, which excludes Cuba. On Jan 31, 1962, the OAS’s Eighth Meeting of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs, held in Punta del Este, Uruguay, passed a resolution excluding Cuba from the Inter-American system due to the island nation’s Marxist-Leninist government and its alignment with the Communist bloc.
The decision was passed with the supporting votes of 14 countries, one negative vote (Cuba), and six abstentions (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Ecuador and Mexico). Following the suspension from the Washington-based OAS, all the governments of the region, with the sole exception of Mexico, broke off diplomatic relations with Cuba.
According to former Cuban diplomat Carlos Lechuga, Washington secured the votes in favour of excluding Cuba ”through pressure and extortion,” violating both the OAS and United Nations charters. “For much of these past 50 years we’ve been cornered, but we’ve put up a strong defence,” Raúl Castro said during his recent visit to Brazil, in reference to the period of international isolation that began in 1962, as the Cuban Revolution also became a reference point for any leftist movement that chose to take up arms.
Although Cuban authorities deny having played a role as ”exporters of revolution” they have recognised that during the 1960s and 1970s they supported and encouraged armed revolutionary movements that emerged in several countries to fight against their national ”oligarchies” and the United States’ ‘imperial policy’ in the region.
According to researchers, the worst moment in Cuba’s relations with other governments of the region was during the 1962-1975 period. In 1975, the OAS amended a 1964 resolution that forced its member states to suspend diplomatic, trade and consular relations with Cuba.
The biggest row occurred with Mexico, during the presidency of Vicente Fox (2000-2006). But Fox’s successor, Felipe Calderón, ironed out the differences, and diplomatic relations between the two countries are now strong, with both presidents planning official visits for 2009.
Today, Cuba maintains ties with all the countries of Latin America, with the exception of El Salvador and Costa Rica, with which it has only restored consular relations. Since the 1990s, Cuba strengthened its cooperation with Latin America and the Caribbean, especially in the fields of health and education, through literacy programmes, specialised medical assistance, and free training for health professionals.
—IPS News


