US freezes N-pact with Russia

Published September 9, 2008

WASHINGTON, Sept 8: President George Bush on Monday froze a lucrative civilian nuclear pact with Russia, the first big penalty imposed on Moscow after its war with Georgia but one that can be reversed.

“The president intends to notify Congress that he has today rescinded his prior determination regarding the US-Russia agreement for peaceful nuclear cooperation, the so-called 1-2-3 Agreement,” Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said in a statement read by spokesman Sean McCormack.

While Mr Bush’s decision to withdraw the agreement from congressional review was seen as punitive, it was also meant to preserve the deal, a senior US official said.

That official said the administration wanted to ensure the accord did not go to a vote in Congress, where it could have been rejected following Russia’s military action in Georgia. If rejected, it would be difficult for a new presidential administration to pursue the agreement in the future.

“It (the nuclear accord) was likely to be killed simply as a protest in the Senate and so therefore what we are doing is rescinding the certificate that he (President Bush) had to give due to the situation in Georgia. Thus he is rendering this thing not legislatively viable,” said the senior US official.

“It is something that we can reverse at any time either by sending a new certificate or lifting this action,” he added.

“What it does is freezes the status of it.”

Mr Bush or a future president could resubmit it for consideration by Congress, which would have 90 legislative days to block it.

Rice also made clear the decision could be reversed.

“We make this decision with regret. Unfortunately given the current environment the time is not right for this agreement.

We will re-evaluate the situation at a later date as we followdevelopments closely,” her statement said.

In Moscow, a nuclear official also said it was the only way to save the deal and the White House had explained this.

“We have recently received a letter from the White House where they mentioned that this was the only way to save this agreement for the new administration,” the official said.—Reuters

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...