Revised master plan devoid of transport planning
By Aileen Qaiser
THE capital’s revised master plan, the layout of which was published in Dawn last week, envisions transforming Islamabad from the scenic city of bureaucrats and diplomats into a culturally vibrant city bustling with commerce, industry and tourism by the year 2030.
Residents are already beginning to get a feel of the new Islamabad with the completion of several major road improvement projects in the city, the most notable of which is the signal- free Seventh Avenue with five underpasses, inaugurated last month.
The other ongoing and upcoming road improvement projects — including flyovers at Zero Point and at the intersection of Jinnah Avenue and Faisal Avenue, and a new 34-km-Margalla bypass which, as evident in the revised master plan, runs along the foothills of the Margalla Hills and serves the new GHQ and an expanded Diplomatic Enclave — will hopefully give Islamabad one of the most efficient road networks in any Pakistani city.
However, one important aspect that seems to be missing in the revised master plan is transport planning within the city of 1.2 million people. Land use planning, particularly in road network, ought to go hand in hand with transport planning since the two are closely related. But the revised master plan is apparently devoid of any material proposals for the development of the transport/transit sector to meet the commuting needs of the population in Islamabad, in particular, and that of the twin cities, in general, (Terms of Reference for the Feasibility Study of a Rapid Mass Transit System for the Twin Cities, July 2007).
However, outside of the revised master plan, and without apparently first carrying out a general transportation study or formulating a general urban transport plan and policy, CDA and the railways ministry have both announced plans for a rail-based Rapid Mass Transit System (RMTS) for the twin cities.
In fact, CDA has recently invited bids from international consultants for a feasibility study and reference design for an RMTS for the twin cities.
Although the twin cities are characteristically very different from each other in history and identity, they have nevertheless developed into a common labour market. Their combined population totals 2.78 million, and is expected to increase to 7 million in 25 years’ time, according to the Terms of Reference for the Feasibility Study on the RMTS for the Twin Cities. It is also estimated that 525,000 people commute daily between the twin cities with an estimated public transport demand of at least 158,000 people.
Although roads and highways have been growing with the traffic in the twin cities, traffic volume is growing faster than the progress needed to widen them. Moreover, public transportation has not developed commensurate with the population and road network.
Since the gradual deregulation of the state-run urban buses from the 1970s to the 1990s, the consistent lack of a visionary plan for an urban public transport infrastructure has resulted in the emergence of a system of fragmented services in the twin cities carried out by a large number of individually operated small vehicles that include mini-buses, coaches and taxis. That this system is not well coordinated and not efficient from an overall perspective has been documented in the print media.
Not surprisingly, the RMTS Terms of Reference document cited the ‘totally missing bus services,’ ‘increasing congestion and environmental pollution due to rapidly increasingly vehicle numbers and the use of old vehicles particularly for the minibus fleet’ and ‘overcrowding on mini-buses’ as justifications for a rail system for the twin cities.
But judging by urban public transport policies in many other cities abroad, any efficient and constructive transport model is usually based on a combination of rail and bus rapid transit rather than a rail only transit system. Most mass transit rail systems in other cities elsewhere are complemented by dozens of bus routes timed to connect with the trains making it easy for people to get to work, school, shopping or wherever they need to go.
In fact, a study twelve years ago conducted by the now defunct National Transport Research Centre of the ministry of communications in conjunction with foreign consultants had looked at two mass transit solutions for the twin cities, viz., a bus only system and a mixed light rail-cum-bus system (Greater Islamabad-Rawalpindi Area Transportation Study, September 1995).
But since then, several attempts to launch and run some sort of a bus rapid transit system in the twin cities (e.g., the Varan bus, the Green bus, etc.) have persistently run into problems, although successful bus services are being run in other cities in the country. In the latest attempt, reported in an English daily last week, recent bidding for launching a bus service in the twin cities, in which some 11 companies apparently applied, was mysteriously cancelled.
The actual reason behind the failure so far to establish a simple bus system in the twin cities is not clear, although reasons like loss of employment for thousands of small transporters (mini-buses and taxis) and thus, pressure from the existing transporters and their influential supporters against a bus system, have been cited in the press. Another reason could be competition between the authorities in Islamabad and Rawalpindi in launching a bus system for the twin cities.
Whatever the reason, addressing the issue as soon as possible and coming up with a solution is necessary because the efficiency and success of the proposed rail-based mass transit system for the twin cities depends in large part on the simultaneous establishment of a coordinated bus system to provide crucial supporting services to the rail network.


