Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

June 30, 2007 Saturday Jamadi-us-Sani 14, 1428





PESHAWAR: PHC orders release of 11 tribal chiefs



Bureau Report


PESHAWAR, June 29: The Peshawar High Court on Friday directed the Kurram Agency administration to release forthwith 11 tribal maliks arrested under the FCR failing which contempt of court proceedings would be initiated against it.

A two-member bench comprising Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan and Justice Jehanzeb Raheem was hearing a contempt of court petition. It observed that despite directives of the high court issued in May, the authorities had failed to release the detainees.

Malik Janan, Malik Zahoor, Malik Mazda Jan and others were arrested on the order of Lower Kurram Assistant Political Agent Dost Mohammad on Feb 17.

The administration claimed that it arrested the detainees because they were instigating the general public against the re-demarcation between the Kurram Agency and Hangu district.

A bench of the high court comprising Chief Justice Tariq Pervez Khan and Justice Ejaz Afzal Khan had on May 9 ordered the administration to release them on furnishing surety bonds.

The bench on Friday asked the administration’s counsel Iqbal Durrani why had they not been obeying the court orders. The counsel contended that the detainees had been a threat to public order.

Barrister Masood Kausar appeared for the detainees and contended that they had approached the administration, but the authorities did not accept the court orders. He argued that it was a clear case of contempt of the court.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007