Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Dawn e-paper
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Jawed Naqvi Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

April 27, 2007 Friday Rabi-us-Sani 09, 1428





Russia freezes rms treaty


OSLO, April 26: A dispute over US plans to station anti-missile bases in eastern Europe escalated Thursday as Russia froze a key defence treaty in a move that raised “grave concern” among Nato allies.

In heated Nato talks in Oslo, Norway, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Ivanov warned that Russia was to halt its application of the Conventional Forces in Europe (CFE) treaty and could even pull out if the allies did not endorse it.

“It means that we will halt the compliance of our obligations under the treaty,” he told reporters, after launching what was described by a US official as a 20-minute “diatribe” against Nato.

His remarks came after Russian President Vladimir Putin, in a state of the nation address, called for the freeze in response to the US missile shield plans.

The CFE treaty was signed in 1990 in Paris by the countries of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (Nato) and the former Warsaw Pact to limit troop and hardware deployments in Europe.

It was adapted in Istanbul in 1999 following the collapse of the Warsaw Pact, in order to limit deployments on a country-by-country basis.

Nato states have refused to ratify the new pact on the grounds that Moscow has failed to honour commitments made in Istanbul to withdraw Russian forces from the former Soviet republics of Georgia and Moldova.

US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said that Russia's involvement in the CFE was a treaty obligation “and everyone is expected to live up to treaty obligations.” But Lavrov countered that “the balance has been impaired for a long time and seriously in favour of Nato. The CFE was a very valuable treaty and that has been made valueless”.

He expressed hope that the allies would eventually ratify the adapted pact, but said: “I didn't hear today any kind of desire for the urgency of that.” “All I heard today was the same old tune about the Istanbul commitments, about the situation of Moldova and Georgia.” Lavrov said that Russia, one of only four countries to have ratified the adapted CFE, found itself “in a position where we don't want to be the only actors in a theatre of the absurd.” Scheffer, who described the two hour session of the informal Nato Russia Council as lively, said the allies were deeply concerned by Moscow's move to place a “de facto moratorium” on the treaty.

“That message was met by concern, grave concern, disappointment and deep regret because the allies are of the opinion that the CFE treaty is one of the cornerstones of European security,” he said.

US officials said Lavrov had railed against Nato over issues ranging from enlargement to the planned missile shield extension, which will see 10 interceptors based in Poland and a radar tracker in the Czech Republic.

“He listed a litany of complaints about Nato,” a senior official said, but added that the remarks may have backfired on Russia by consolidating support among the allies for the shield, meant to counter “rogue states” like Iran.

Lavrov noted that the shield leaves gaps in its coverage of Europe, with Bulgaria, Greece, Romania and Turkey left outside.

“This shows that the Americans are not interested in defending Europe,” the official, speaking on condition of anonymity, reported Lavrov as saying.

However “the pushback (from Nato countries) was universal, including by allies who are reserved on missile defence,” the official said.

But he rejected thoughts of a return to the Cold War.

“I don't think its about to boil over. I think this is in the area of politics rather than something much more serious,” he said.

Earlier on Thursday, Rice complained that Russia was applying Cold War logic to a defensive proposal aimed not at Moscow but at countering the emerging threat of ballistic missiles in the hands of “rogue states” like Iran. “Let's be real about this,” she said.

“The idea that somehow 10 interceptors and a few radars in eastern Europe are going to threaten the Soviet strategic return is purely ludicrous and everybody knows it,” she said, in her own Cold War slip by referring to the ex-Soviet Union.

—AFP






Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2007