Low Graphics Site
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]()
|
Delhi’s king-size blunder
The questions on everybody’s lips even now are: one, is the government so ill-informed and insensitive to democratic struggles; two, is the government so caught up in helping the US realise its own interests that it is quite prepared to sacrifice Indian interests; three, can the government be trusted to protect Indian interests? Prime Minister Singh, on way to Germany the next morning, showed no signs of second thoughts, even after a strong anti-India sentiment engulfed the streets of Nepal. His rather dangerous determination to “stay the course” at any cost, made him tell reporters accompanying him on the visit that his government was wedded to the twin pillar concept, that it was supportive of a constitutional monarchy (even though it had been rejected vociferously by the people of Nepal!), and what was even worse, the government was prepared to re-examine the proposal to send arms to the Himalayan state. It was almost as if he had no idea of what was happening on the ground in Nepal, and that either his people had not informed him or that he actually did not give a damn. The day played out in Nepal with the widespread protest acquiring a decided anti-India hue, and it was made clear by the SPA leadership that they were not going to buckle under this pressure, and that the agitation would intensify until their legitimate demands for the revival of parliament, establishment of a Constituent Assembly and elections were met. It was clear, even before Dr Karan Singh’s visit, that all of Nepal had joined the agitation against the King. The students, academics, lawyers, doctors, and finally even the civil servants had turned against the monarchy. It is thus, still a mystery as to what inputs prompted the Prime Minister to turn his government’s — and in the process, India’s — back on democracy and embrace a man who has become the symbol of oppression for the people of Nepal. Key advisers to the government here were absolutely aghast with the Indian response, as were the political parties who had no idea at all of what was coming. The Left parties rushed in, in an attempt to salvage the situation and CPI(M)’s Sitaram Yechury was rushed to make common cause with the democratic forces and the Maoists, and work out a face saving solution before the anti-India sentiment took a violent form. Interestingly, the fact that the government had not thought out matters and was only following some kind of directive from the top, became apparent when a panicky foreign secretary called a press conference on the same night that Prime Minister Singh had left for Germany to declare that the twin pillar concept was no longer valid, that no arms were being sent to Nepal, and that the government stood firmly with the people of Nepal. There was not a word in common between the Prime Minister’s press conference in the comfort of Air India One on the way to Germany, and the foreign secretary’s briefing a few hours later. The next day, Dr Manmohan Singh, again in Germany, backtracked furiously insisting that his government would never desert the people of Nepal. In Delhi, defence minister Pranab Mukherjee rushed into some levels of damage control. Sitaram Yechury worked out a seven-point formula with the SPA and the Maoists and discussed this in detail with Mr Mukherjee who then held a high level meeting with the home minister, the intelligence chiefs, the Army chief and others. The Indian ambassador to Nepal was told to make it clear to the King that he had no option but to back off, and to concede to the demands, as there was every possibility that Tuesday’s agitation of a million people would turn violent and leave him with no option but to flee the country. Basically, that New Delhi had had second thoughts and was no longer prepared to back the monarch as had been earlier stated by Dr Manmohan Singh. Strange isn’t it, the Prime Minister’s policy was overturned by his Cabinet colleague with Dr Manmohan Singh placing himself in that strange position where within 24 hours he himself was compelled to give entirely different statements on Nepal? Despite his aversion to the Maoists, the prime minister will have to accept them as they have been accepted by the SPA and the people of Nepal. The Maoists have made it very clear that they are totally prepared to give up the gun for a democratic government in Nepal, and it is now imperative that they are brought on board. US inspired attempts to scuttle this will only lead to an unsettled Nepal, an unstable government, and an eventual return to an oppressive regime. The people have sacrificed their lives for a better future, and it is only the arrogant and the insensitive governments who can ignore this, and that too — as India has learnt — at their own peril. It was frightening, however, to see how out of tune with reality New Delhi was in the region and how cunning became its political machinations. Indian interests cannot be furthered by secret pacts and deals, but by factoring in the people’s aspirations that were so very visible and transparent in Nepal. —By arrangement with The Asianage
|
||||||||||||
|
Contributions Privacy Policy © DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006 |