Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

April 26, 2006 Wednesday Rabi-ul-Awwal 27, 1427

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




Balochistan food secretary gets contempt notice


ISLAMABAD, April 25: The Supreme Court on Tuesday served contempt of the court notice against Balochistan’s food secretary for behaving disrespectfully during a court proceeding.

The bench, led by Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, served the notice against Secretary Food Balochistan Ali Zaheer while hearing a suo motu case on exorbitant flour prices in Balochistan. The secretary is required to respond within a week.

The suo motu action was taken after the court noted that flour mill owners were selling wheat flour at an inflated price despite release of flour on subsidy. The court also noted that the benefit of subsidy was not being passed on to people.

The court also asked Assistant Advocate-General Balochistan Sultan Mehmood to submit complete record, detailing the amount of wheat released by the provincial government besides specifying how much subsidy it had given to mill owners.

During the proceedings, the food secretary said that those who had submitted the complaint were “blackmailers”.

The bench reminded the secretary that he should behave like a senior government officer and cautioned about the court’s decorum.

At this point, the secretary left the court room but returned after being summoned by the court. The bench then informed him that it was issuing a contempt of court notice and he should reply within seven days.—Staff Correspondent






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2006