Low Graphics Site
White bar
.: Latest News :. .: News in Pictures :.
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker



Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
DAWN - the Internet Edition


September 12, 2005 Monday Sha’aban 7, 1426
Features


Coastline catastrophe
Carrot-and-stick approach in Sindh politics
Is it dense to defy the US?



Coastline catastrophe


By Maheen A. Rashdi

KARACHI: Hundreds of small dead fish lay strewn across the shoreline at the Seaview beach last week. Observing the scene one onlooker commented: It is as if a sick sea has vomited its contents.

Once upon a time - not so long ago - the sands of Karachi beaches were so pristine and smooth that the sensation of walking on them was truly relaxing for frazzled city nerves. The sea breeze provided the perfect ambience for convalescents and the ebb and flow of the clear, white foamy waves, the perfect backdrop for romantics. But now the beach front greets us with a foul smell and blackish waves and squalid sands, which are best walked on with covered feet.

The report of the ‘findings’ of the National Institute of Oceanography regarding the mass arrival of dead fish on Seaview beach in itself warrants a comment. NIO director-general Dr M.M. Rabbani confirmed that the fish found on the beach died because of the “choking of gills and breathing problems that had occurred due to oil concentration in the sediment and water along the coast”. But discussions with experienced marine scientists reveal two causes not mentioned by the DG. They note that one cause could be the phenomenon called ‘red tide’ — common near all seashores and harbours — in which a large school of dead fish get washed up on shore. The fish usually die to a sudden lack of oxygen in the water which is consumed by mass reproduction of plankton.

Another possible reason could be marine pollution not from oil but other man-made sources like refuse, garbage and human waste.

None of these possible reasons were mentioned in the findings of the NIO. Instead, reference was made to the Tasman Spirit oil spill which was cited as the main cause of combination of oil with suspended sediments in the seawater and consequent contamination of seabed habitats. The presence of high oil content in our seabed should be an issue of national alarm as it has risen to dangerous levels but it cannot just be blamed on one oil spill disaster.

All ports have to provide a facility to ships in harbour of special barges and trucks in which engine oil sludge is disposed of. The Karachi Port Trust has no such facility and hence besides foreign ships that dump their waste oil in our waters, local ships also do so, which shows that KPT officials are unaware of their role in controlling oil dumping.

Besides, this is not the only environmental catastrophe taking place along our coastline. Marine pollution is increasing due to both maritime and land-based activities and international agencies have warned that Karachi harbour and the Marine Channel are among the most polluted areas. Oil terminals, oil-storage facilities, and workshops at shipyard operated by various organizations are also a continuing source of marine pollution. Similarly, activities by the Pakistan Steel Mills, the Bin Qasim Power Plant and shipping activities at Port Qasim also comprise a source of pollution.

Despite a number of agencies and government departments functioning to protect our environment no concrete steps have been worked on to truly monitor marine pollution.

Reports on the Indus River estuaries and its associated creeks have always noted that our seas are highly productive. But in the past few decades, hypersaline conditions and environmental degradation have considerably reduced the potential of marine growth.

Though recorded data on the fish fauna in the area is limited as no fish stock assessment surveys have been carried out, it is estimated that our waters still have a high number of species and faunal abundance. In fact, in pre-partition days, oysters used to be harvested from the Indus estuarine and transported to India for British expatriates. But subsequent data reveals a declining trend in this activity and an eventual collapse of fishery. Most oyster beds are now depleted because of environmental degradation.

Ironically, none of the departments concerned the Karachi Port Trust, the Sindh Environment Protection Agency, the Institute of Oceanography, the KMC or the city government — can be seen losing sleep over the issue.

Garbage is still dumped along the beaches which the high tide carries to the open sea along the coast where the fish usually come for their feed. It is essential to treat industrial waste through two stages before discharging it into the water. Since the KMC has no treatment plant, the refuse is discharged with its full toxic content.

Since most of the marine agencies are manned by politically appointed people, there can be little hope of the significance of marine pollution ever being realized.

Two years back when a dead whale was washed ashore on Clifton beach, one would have thought that these agencies would wake up, but nothing happened. In fact, lethargy exists to such a level that even after the Tasman Spirit oil spill disaster, Pakistan has still not become a signatory to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships and the International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation.

Top



Carrot-and-stick approach in Sindh politics


By Aziz Malik

HYDERABAD: It only happens in Sindh that when the Pakistan Muslim League has to get a new lease of life, someone must be there with the carrot and the stick approach.

In the 90s, the task was performed by Jam Sadiq Ali.

At present, Arbab Ghulam Rahim is doing the job ruthlessly using both the carrot, which this time is too little, and the stick, which is so large that the PPP has been wiped out of the interior of Sindh.

The government and the Election Commission have absolved themselves of any responsibility for the murders on the plea that they had nothing to do with the elections and were committed outside polling stations due to personal enmity.

But the incidents provide an indication of the extent to which the elections were marked by violence, rigging, ballot-box snatching, hooliganism and clashes.

The chief minister did not touch Karachi or Hyderabad cities but staked his claim to other districts of Sindh.

He even included Jamshoro and Nawabshah into his schemes of things though the PPP had won a clear majority in the two districts as far as seats of nazims and naib nazims of union councils are concerned.

However, it is the councillors who will make the difference and the chief minister is manoeuvring for his favourite nazim candidates. So no one should be surprised if the Khushal Pakistan panel forms district governments in the two districts also.

Even the newly-created Tando Allahyar district from where Benazir Bhutto had contested elections, has gone to the government-backed Azad Magsi Ittehad.

The irony is that the PPP has lost Larkana and one cannot say with certainty that it will be able to form the even the district government there.

Another stronghold of the PPP where it ruled for the last four years is Khairpur. The district has been captured by the PML-F and Pir Pagaro will be the final arbiter.

What happened in the Dadu district before and after the polls can be judged from one single example — an officer of the rank of superintendent of police — was detained by Rangers for several hours to prevent him from interfering in the polling process.

What happened in the Thatta district has been reported in detail in the press. If MPA Sassui Palijo is to be believed -– and there is no reason to disbelieve her — she was fired upon by the government-backed men on the election day.

Sassui Palijo has also made public a white paper spread over 20 pages underlining alleged atrocities committed against PPP activists.

MNA Abdul Ghani Talpur has submitted a privilege motion to the National Assembly secretariat accusing law-enforcement agencies of manhandling him.

Most surprisingly even the Matiari district which has always remained the citadel of the Makhdooms of Hala seems to have been lost by the PPP.

In the 2002 general elections, Makhdoom Amin Fahim was away from the country but did not have to worry about his seat.

During the local body elections, he had stayed in Hala but failed to muster enough support against the Jamote Ittehad which is backed by Pir Pagaro.

Hyderabad district has gone to the MQM as expected after its bifurcation.

Its vote bank no doubt has eroded over the years but not to the extent that it would have lost the elections.

The MQM is poised to form the district government though it will be difficult for it to find a man of personality to head this important district.

Top



Is it dense to defy the US?




AN American senator has called the Indian foreign minister dense simply because he went to Tehran and embraced the Iranian counterpart in a bear hug and had the temerity to discuss prospects of the Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline with him against Washington’s wishes.

It would not be far-fetched to assume that if the Americans have their way with New Delhi, they would effect a drastic change in the Indian foreign ministry, not unlike the regime changes they brought about in Iraq and Afghanistan.

They have enough eager hands in the Indian media to readily comply with such an agenda. A propaganda blitz against Kunwar Natwar Singh has been on for some time now.

So what is it about Natwar Singh that seems to rile the Americans? Is it his clearly discernible grooming as a Cold War-period Indian diplomat when New Delhi was unequivocally aligned with Moscow? Or is it his belief, misplaced according to many, in the prowess of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), never a favourite of Washington that makes him a spoiler for American policy-makers?

Two months before he was inducted as foreign minister in Dr Manmohan Singh’s cabinet following an unexpected verdict from last year’s elections, Mr Natwar Singh gave vent to some key Ideological preferences that may hold a clue or two to his present difficulties with the United States.

In an article headlined ‘Abdicating a Responsibility’, Mr Natwar Singh laid bare his mind just days before the Feb 24 NAM summit in Kuala Lumpur. He wrote: “The President’s address to the joint session of Parliament contained 19 paragraphs on India’s foreign policy and diplomacy. The President spoke on Feb 17. Not once did he refer to non-alignment, although the 13th NAM summit was just a week away. I drew the attention of the Rajya Sabha to this amazing lapse and also brought this to the notice of External Affairs Minister Yashwant Sinha.

“The 13th summit met under the shadow of the Iraq crisis. The summit, under the chairmanship of the outspoken Dr Mahathir Mohammad of Malaysia, came up with an agreed text on Iraq. Atal Behari Vajpayee had this to say on this matter in the Rajya Sabha on March 4, 2003:

“It was a significant achievement that NAM arrived at a balanced consensus text on Iraq. There was unity in the movement on the need for a continuation of multilateral efforts to find a peaceful solution to the Iraq crisis. There was also a clear exhortation to Iraq to fully comply with its obligations under the Security Council resolutions.

“The United States was not mentioned by the prime minister in Kuala Lumpur or in the Rajya Sabha. But the Malaysian prime minister minced no words. He called a spade a spade. His refreshing candour may not be disarming but it certainly is worthy of admiration, even respect.

“India has a pivotal role to play in ensuring that non-alignment remains on the international agenda and the non-aligned group at the United Nations in New York acts in unity on major world issues.

“Will America heed the NAM declaration adopted in Kuala Lumpur? Perhaps not. Will the US listen to the UN Secretary-General? Perhaps not. The new international disorder is now round the corner. Even as Iraq has started to disarm, Bush has raised the stakes. What he now wants is - regime change. What next? Who next?”

Natwar Singh’s difficulties have been compounded by the fact that he works with a prime minister who does not known how to approve of a foreign policy that looks too independent of the United States. This marked difference in policy approaches may have prompted the Indian prime minister to upgrade his media adviser in the administrative pecking order a notch above the foreign ministry spokesman.

While the move may have cut down the chances of confusion between Messrs Singh, say in New York next week, it has loaded the foreign policy equation in favour of an Indian establishment that sees eye to eye with the neo-con establishment in Washington D.C.

It was Indira Gandhi who had anointed Natwar Singh as her trusted foreign policy man in 1983, when she made him the secretary general of the Non-Aligned Movement’s New Delhi summit, held here in lieu of Baghdad because of the raging Iran-Iraq conflict.

That summit was attended by important and powerful leaders of the Third World from both sides of the Cold War divide. Gen Zia-ul-Haq led the pro-American charge and Vietnam, Cuba etc prodded India along a pro-Soviet trajectory.

Many things have changed in international affairs since that summit. The key issue then was the war raging between its two very important members and so it was decided that an Indian envoy would try shuttle diplomacy on behalf of NAM to bring Iran and Iraq to the negotiating table. It didn’t work. What worked was the USS Vincenne’s Shooting down of an Iranian Airbus.

The NAM summit had called for the Americans to vacate Diego Garcia, if I remember correctly. There was also a declaration to make Indian Ocean a nuclear weapons-free zone, an idea possibly slipped in by the pro-Soviet lobby to target the heavy US presence in the region even as troops from Moscow rode deep into Afghanistan.

Another memory from the Natwar Singh era of NAM was the then palpable Arab solidarity in 1983 and its collective declaration of Israel as the villain of the piece in the West Asian imbroglio. Today, all that has changed.

India and Pakistan are declared nuclear states which makes the resolution on the Indian Ocean’s sanctity somewhat nonsensical, even if it is still a highly desirable idea for many of us. Also, both countries are flirting with Israel and Yasser Arafat, the hero of the 1983 NAM Summit, is no more.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union triggered a melee of the suddenly ‘freed’ nations towards Washington, someone asked Fidel Castro why he had remained rigid in his views on the United States. “I am not rigid,” he replied firmly. “I have moved more to the left actually, in relation to my former friends who have moved to the right.”

Castro has earned Washington’s opprobrium for holding a sacrilegious view. Natwar Singh’s mettle as an old war horse is also being tested, at home and abroad.

* * * * *

A reed boat that sought to recreate 4,000 years of India-Oman history and retrace the route that established their trade links in the bronze age, capsized off Oman last week, though its eight-member crew, including Indian archaeologist Alok Tripathi, were reported to have been rescued.

The eight men had hoped to land at Mandvi, in the Kutch region of Gujarat, on Sept 22 on the Neolithic boat laden with a cargo of dates, lime, dried fish, salt and copper vessels. The sailboat was named Magan after the Sumerian description for Oman.

Top



Top of Page





Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005