Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

29 April 2005 Friday 19 Rabi-ul-Awwal 1426

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




Apex court adjourns APNS plea hearing



By Our Staff Reporter


ISLAMABAD, April 28: The Supreme Court on Thursday adjourned for a week the review petition of the All Pakistan Newspapers Society (APNS) challenging the Seven Wage Board Award for newspaper employees. The petition was to be heard by a three-member bench comprising Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, Justice Rana Bhagwandas and Justice Falak Sher. But the hearing was adjourned since the bench was incomplete owing to the absence of one of its member, Justice Falak Sher. The case would be taken up on May 5.

At the outset, APNS counsel Abdul Hafeez Pirzada said that the case had taken a new turn with the filing of a petition before the Supreme Court by some journalists.

He said that the journalists who had filed the petition through advocate Akram Sheikh, had challenged the jurisdiction of the Sindh High Court (SHC) to hear the wage award issue on the grounds that the same had already been discussed on merit by the apex court.

Mr Pirzada said that though these journalists were not a party before the SHC, they had challenged the high court’s jurisdiction despite the fact that the apex court had dismissed the APNS petition on technical grounds, without going into merits.

Moved by 25 petitioners, the APNS review petition was moved against an earlier Supreme Court judgment which through a unanimous order had dismissed its petition against the award.

The APNS filed the review petition with the contention that certain errors of law in the order of dismissal of their petition justified a review of the earlier judgement.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005