It is regrettable that no progress has been made toward initiating a dialogue on the problems and issues agitating Balochistan. Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain's decision last month to set up a senate committee on Balochistan has not materialized yet.
Evidently, the change of guard at the prime minister's office has delayed the committee's formation. No wonder, a lot is being talked about in a manner that serves no purpose. On Monday, Balochistan Chief Minister Jam Mohammad Yusuf spoke of the existence of RAW training centres in the province, and a day later he said terrorist camps in Mekran had been dismantled.
Then on Tuesday, Balochistan Nationalist Party chief Akhtar Mengal spoke of the Baloch people going to any extent in protecting their rights. He had a point when he lambasted both Islamabad and New Delhi for invoking the RAW/ISI bogey every now and then to dodge the real issues. But one wishes he had exercised some restraint during his press conference at the Karachi Press Club.
Balochistan needs a solution to its problems and not tough talk by either side. The issues facing it are both economic and political. It is Pakistan's least developed, though territorially largest, province. It has low literacy and poverty is widespread because of the absence of industry and a thriving agriculture.
Much of its mineral wealth remains unexplored while the coast which has immense potential for fisheries and tourism, has not been sufficiently developed. Some projects have recently been launched - Gwadar port, the coastal highway and the Saindak copper mine.
But the locals fear that they may be denied the fruits of these projects. In matters of employment, they fear that people from outside the province may deprive them of their jobs.
These fears need to be allayed. Another issue is the question of provincial autonomy as guaranteed by the Constitution. In practice, the military's domination of the power structure has had the effect of greater centralism.
These are issues that need a purposeful dialogue in a positive spirit, the aim being to remove the Baloch people's grievances and give them a sense of participation in governance. Let us hope that the proposed senate committee having members from both sides of the house will be formed early and a political dialogue will start in earnest.
Predicament of AIDS patients
The treatment of HIV positive patients as revealed during a seminar in Peshawar the other day is heart-rending and shows just how insensitive we as a society are to those afflicted with life-threatening diseases.
The predicament of some of the AIDS patients, who had the courage to speak of their misfortunes at the meeting (organized by an NGO run by a woman from Parachinar who got the disease unwittingly from her now-dead husband), makes for disturbing reading and shows that the government which is supposed to protect the infirm and the weak is perhaps in the forefront of perpetuating discriminatory practices against them.
Particularly telling is the account of 17-year-old Naila from Bannu. Recounting her terrible experience at one of Peshawar's premier government-run hospitals, she said that because she was suffering from AIDS she had to give birth to her baby in a corridor of the hospital, lying on an iron bed without a mattress.
Clearly, such treatment has a traumatic effect on a patient and is the last thing that someone afflicted with a disease like AIDS would need from a health-care institution.
Some of the speakers at the meeting said that the discrimination against AIDS patients was perhaps partly the result of the stifling atmosphere created in the province by the MMA government.
This assessment might not be off the mark given that the perception among many in Pakistani society, especially the narrow-minded and obscurantist elements, is that the disease is a divine punishment for indulging in promiscuity.
Such people have obviously little knowledge that AIDS is sometimes also contracted through the transfusion of unscreened contaminatedblood and from hypodermic needles.
And why treat an AIDS patient as an untouchable and shun contact with him/her when it is known that it is not an infectious disease that can be communicated by breathing or touch?