Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


24 June 2004 Thursday 05 Jamadi-ul-Awwal 1425



PESHAWAR: Law not extended to Pata, court told - Kidnapping for ransom

By Bureau Report


PESHAWAR, June 23: The law dealing with kidnapping for ransom has not been extended to the Provincially Administered Tribal Areas (Pata), a counsel stated before the Peshawar High Court on Tuesday.

The counsel, Main Abdul Fayyaz, argued before a two-member bench comprising Justice Malik Hamid Saeed and Justice Ijaz Afzal, that for extending a law to Pata the provincial governor has to issue special notification, which has yet not been issued despite the passage of more than a decade.

The bench issued notice to the provincial law department and sought clarification whether the law was extended to Pata or not. Mian Abdul Fayyaz was arguing in a criminal appeal filed by Amir Badshah, challenging his conviction by an anti-terrorism court in Malakand (Pata).

The ATC had convicted the appellant under section 365-A of Pakistan Penal Code on May 12, 2003. He was sentenced to life imprisonment. The appellant was charged with kidnapping a boy for ransom.

The appellant's counsel contended that through the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1989, section 365-A was inserted in the Pakistan Penal Code. He added that under Article 247 of the Constitution, the NWFP governor has to issue a notification with the approval of the president for extending a law to Pata. He added that no such notification was issued till date.

Mr Fayyaz argued that the charge framed against the appellant and his conviction was illegal. The bench observed that it would be appropriate to issue notice to the law department for clarifying the situation.




Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2004