The government's decision to opt for two gas pipelines - one bringing in gas from Qatar and another from Turkmenistan - is a move in the right direction. A final decision in this regard is expected in December.
There has been a lot of delay in deciding the route of pipelines for the import of gas which will be needed in the coming decades. The options include import from Turkmenistan through an overland pipeline passing through Afghanistan; from Qatar through an underwater pipeline; overland directly from Iran.
One reasons for the delay was the political and security situation in Afghanistan as well hindrances resulting from the US-led economic sanctions against Iran.
Another reason was that some local gas discoveries made a calculation uncertain as to when the country would need to import gas to meet the growing domestic demand. As things stand, Pakistan would need to import gas by 2010 when the growing demand is projected to outstrip local supply.
Gas is playing an increasingly important role in the country. Oil import bills have come down in the past few years with many industries switching from oil to gas for fuel.
Oil consumption fell by a significant 20 per cent in the first half of the financial year 2003-04 as more industries made the switch-over. The use of compressed natural gas for vehicles has also increased significantly.
This is a cheap and pollution-free alternative to petrol and diesel. The government has put in place the massive $1.4 billion Gas Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project (GIRP), which will ensure that the natural gas supply and distribution can cope with the increase in demand.
Pakistan is expected to make a $750 million saving in its three billion-dollar oil import bill in the coming year as a result of increased reliance on gas. These savings can only be sustained if supplies are ensured at economical rates in the coming years. This is why Pakistan's plans to finalize a pipeline project need to be pursued seriously.
A wrong move
The Karachi Port Trust authorities' decision to stop the completion of a charitable school in Keamari on technical grounds seems all wrong. The school, being set up by an educational organization in cooperation with the local police, would have been able to accommodate 700 students from this lower middle class locality if it were allowed to open its doors this year.
It would be the first such school in the area set up by philanthropists to impart quality education to children on a subsidized fee structure. It could also serve as a model for good police-community relations.
Given all this, it is ironical that the KPT chose to stop its construction on the grounds that rules did not permit a school in a residential compound - despite the fact that a madressah is operating in the same compound without any problem.
The whole issue has to be seen in the larger context. Our cities are now littered with schools built in residential areas, and no one seems much bothered by this. The KPT can make an exception in this particular case considering the school's non-commercial status.
It will allow children of the area facilities that they would otherwise never have access to. In the past, there have been several occasions where the KPT has changed the rules to suit itself.
Take for example the housing scheme that is being built near the boating basin on mangrove land. The KPT can offer to build a similar school on its lands elsewhere. The number of schools in Sindh is far fewer than the need.
To add to this is the problem that several school buildings have been encroached upon by influential people. The government should make a serious effort to have these buildings vacated.
At the same time, it should also support initiatives to have new schools built in the private sector, especially in areas where it has no facility of its own.