KARACHI, April 28: The Supreme Court was moved on Wednesday for leave to appeal the Sindh High Court order in the Shaista Almani case. Petitioner Khuda Bakhsh Almani submitted through Advocate Ghulam Qadir Jatoi that right from the first day the proceedings of the case were not confined to the parameters laid down by the constitution for the exercise of writ jurisdiction.

No detailed inquiry could have been held in the plea for production of the alleged detainees. The petitioner was "allowed to be humiliated by the non-governmental organizations" in the course of the proceedings.

The recording of the statements of the alleged detainees was also not fair. The petitioner's name was unduly deleted from the list of respondents, he maintained.

An SHC division bench had declared Shaista Almani and Balakhsher Maher 'sui juris' on March 30 and allowed them to decide on their future relationship as legally competent citizens. It did not rule on the validity or otherwise of their marriage as the issue was not before it for adjudication.

Opinion

Editorial

GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...
Centre vs provinces
Updated 10 Jun, 2026

Centre vs provinces

The reason the centre finds itself in this position is rooted in its failure to expand the tax net and boost revenues.
Party in crisis
10 Jun, 2026

Party in crisis

THE young KP chief minister must be starting to realise just how thorny a seat he occupies. There has been a flurry...
Varsity woes
10 Jun, 2026

Varsity woes

FINANCIAL crises affecting public sector universities across Pakistan are now having an impact on academic...