Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Weather
Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon PTV 2 Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Mazdak Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story


04 April 2004 Sunday 13 Safar 1425



Data given to UN was not solid, admits Powell


WASHINGTON, April 3: US Secretary of State Colin Powell acknowledged on Friday that information he gave the United Nations on Iraq's mobile biological weapons laboratories to justify last year's invasion did not appear "solid" any longer.

Before the invasion, Mr Powell presented the United Nations with data proclaiming to prove that Iraq was engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction.

"Now it appears not to be the case, that it was that solid," Mr Powell told reporters on the plane taking him back to Washington from Brussels.

"But at the time I was preparing that presentation it was presented to me as being solid," he said.

Mr Powell said that before his Feb 5 speech at the United Nations he had asked the Central Intelligence Agency for data that would show the danger of the weapons of mass destruction Iraq was supposedly developing, and which have never been found in Iraq.

The US failure to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq following the country's occupation has embarrassed the US administration, damaged its reputation around the world and drawn sharp criticism of the US intelligence community.

"Now, if the sources fell apart, then we need to find out how we've gotten ourselves in that position," he said. "I've had discussions about it with the CIA."

He said the information about the suspected labs and other Iraqi weapons facilities had been presented to him in preparation for his speech before the UN Security Council "as the best information and intelligence that we had."

"And I looked at the four elements that they gave me for that one and they stood behind them," Mr Powell said.

The secretary of state expressed the hope an independent commission that is going to be starting its work soon will look into these matters to see whether or not the intelligence agency had a basis for the confidence that they placed in the intelligence at that time.

He said he said been assured by the intelligence agencies, prior to his UN presentation, had given him all the assurances that the information he was working on was solid.

But Mr Powell also said he had made an effort to check it himself.

"I'm not the intelligence community, but I probed and made sure, as I said in my presentation, these are multi-sourced," he said. "And that was the most dramatic of them and I made sure it was multi-sourced."

The Washington Post reported last month that information about the mobile laboratories was second-hand and came from an Iraqi exile, a chemist, who had never been interrogated by US intelligence officials.

The exile was also linked to the Iraqi National Congress, a group that had been pressing for a US invasion of Iraq to overthrow the government of Saddam Hussein, according to the report.

Mr Powell indicated on Tuesday that he might have refrained from recommending a US invasion of Iraq, if he had had proof that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

But he said that President Bush had taken the right decision to launch military action against the country.-AFP

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

© The DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2004