Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

June 22, 2003 Sunday Rabi-us-Sani 21,1424


KARACHI: New wildlife board delayed



By Bhagwandas


KARACHI, June 21: The Sindh Wildlife Management Board, which was dissolved a couple of months ago, is yet to be reconstituted. The board was headed by the chief executive of the province.

Established in 1970, the board used to work independently and met its expenses by imposing fines on poachers and from hunting fees.

The sources said in early 1990s the then government in its bid to win over a member of Sindh assembly, who was also a hunter, created a wildlife department and made him wildlife minister. Despite some disagreements, the department and the board co-existed for a certain period.

The then board was dissolved and reconstituted in 2002, the sources said.

Soon after the present government assumed power in 2003, that board was dissolved as well.

The sources said very few of the board members were conservationists and a large number of them had been poachers and hunters.

A look at the last board dissolved in April 2003 revealed that out of the 13 private members only three were not hunters. Three other members were representatives of various international wildlife conservation organizations and others were government officials.

After the board’s revival in 2002, it held at least six meetings in less than six months, but after the present government assumed office, the board meetings could not be held on a regular basis, the sources said.

The sources claimed that the ministers usually considered that the board was interfering in the wildlife department’s official matters. As a result they preferred to work without a board.



Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)

Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005