NEW YORK, April 25: President Bush said on Friday that Iraqi officials and scientists had provided the United States with information that Saddam Hussein might have destroyed or dispersed chemical and biological weapons before the war, suggesting that it would be a long search.

“I think there’s going to be scepticism until people find out there was, in fact, a weapons of mass destruction programme,” he said in an interview with NBC on Thursday.

Despite that, he expressed confidence that American forces would eventually find chemical and biological weapons.

“We are learning more as we interrogate or have discussions with Iraqi scientists and people within the Iraqi structure, that perhaps he destroyed some, perhaps he dispersed some,” Mr Bush said.

The US president said there was considerable evidence that Saddam Hussein was dead or severely wounded but that the United States did not have definitive proof, like DNA, that the Iraqi leader had been killed.

Mr Bush also said the resistance faced by American troops in southern Iraq in the conflict’s first weeks was fiercer than he had expected, an admission that seemed at odds with the Pentagon’s insistence at the time that the war was unfolding according to plan.

“Shock and awe said to many people that all we’ve got to do is unleash some might and people will crumble,” Mr Bush said in the interview, his most extensive since the invasion of Iraq. “And it turns out the fighters were a lot fiercer than we thought.”

He gave a detailed account of how the war looked from his perspective as commander-in-chief. He said he had some initial concerns about the first blow of the war, his last-minute decision to bomb a home in Baghdad where an agent had reported that Mr Hussein and his sons might be spending the night.

But in the end, Mr Bush said, he was convinced that he had a good opportunity to kill Mr Hussein. The agent who provided the information from the scene, he added, judged the bombing a success.

Asked if it might take two years to bring stability to Iraq, Mr Bush replied: “It could, it could. Or less. Who knows?”

However, Mr Bush did not elaborate on the evidence that the United States had gathered since the war’s end about Iraq’s weapons programmes. He acknowledged that questions about the credibility of the United States would not be put to rest until weapons were found.

RELATIONS WITH FRANCE: Mr Bush had nothing nice to say about President Jacques Chirac of France, who led the opposition to a United Nations resolution authorizing the use of military force against Iraq. “I doubt he’ll be coming to the ranch anytime soon,” he said.

Mr Bush expressed fear that the disagreement would weaken the Nato alliance, and in recent days some administration officials have been talking about marginalizing France within Nato.

“Hopefully,” Mr Bush said, “the past tensions will subside, and the French won’t be using their position within Europe to create alliances against the United States, or Britain, or Spain, or any of the new countries that are the new democracies in Europe.”

IRAN: Mr Bush acknowledged that he was concerned about power vacuum in Iraq “being filled by Iranian agents.”

“We have sent word to the Iranians that’s what we expect,” he said, adding that he had talked to Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain and Jose Maria Aznar of Spain about that subject on Wednesday, to get them “to send the same message.”

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

WHILE launching the Economic Survey 2026, Finance Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb told a hopeful story of economic...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...