Low Graphics Site
White bar
Daily SectionMarker

Misc SectionMarker

Horoscope Recipes Weekly SectionMarker

Weekly SectionMarker

Pakistan's Internet Magazine
Herald
Dawn GroupMarker

Archive, Search, Feedback & HelpMarker

Dawn Classified



FrontPage National International Local Business KSE Forex Sports Editorial Opinion Letters Features Today's Cartoon TV Guide Cowasjee Ayaz Irfan Hussain Review Dawn Magazine Young World Images Dawn Group Subscription To Advertise

DINA
Previous Story DAWN - the Internet Edition Next Story

April 4, 2003 Friday Safar 1, 1424

Click to learn more...
Please Visit our Sponsor (Ads open in separate window)
.




SC to conclude hearing of 700 cases



By Our Staff Reporter


ISLAMABAD, April 3: The Supreme Court on Thursday said it would conclude hearing of over 700 cases pertaining to the recruitment of over 1,000 persons, who were inducted in the Sui Southern Gas Company Limited during the Benazir government but were shown the door by the next government of PML-N.

The Chief Justice of Supreme Court has constituted a five judges special bench to decide all the petitions, civil appeals, and review petitions filed by the affected persons. The bench is expected to pronounce authoritative pronouncement on the issue which is lingering on from last many years.

The judgment would decide whether the person inducted in the SSGC as trainee engineers and management trainees, were SSGC employees or not.

The court has so far heard prominent counsels like Wasim Sajjad, Abid Hasan Minto, Mohammad Akram Sheikh, Abdul Hafeez Pirzada, and Iftikhar Gillani for the petitioners and Chaudhry Jameel for the SSGCL.

The court was informed by of the counsel representing petitioners, that the company had spent so much on the legal fee, which would have not been the salary bill of the petitioners.

The SC bench consists of Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry, Justice Qazi Mohammad Farooq, Justice Rana Bhagwandas, Justice Deedar Hussain Shah and Justice Hamid Ali Mirza.

Chaudhry Jameel argued that the judgment of the FSTl, which was under challenge in SC, was not a judicial verdict, as one member of the FST bench was not competent to sit on the bench.






Previous Story Top of Page Next Story

Seprater
Contributions
Privacy Policy
© DAWN Group of Newspapers, 2005