Judges facing dismissal approach SC

Published November 11, 2001

ISLAMABAD, Nov 10: Four civil judges, facing dismissal, have approached the Supreme Court, demanding that the law, giving unbridled powers to the chief justices of high courts should be declared ultra vires to the provisions of the Constitution.

The petitioners, including Mohammad Yahya Khan Kulachi, civil Judge, Gujrat; Mohammad Afzal Khan, civil judge, Sahiwal; Akhtar Ali Shah Akhtar, civil judge, Burewala, and Mohammad Hanif, civil judge, Rahim Yar Khan, have invoked the original jurisdiction of the apex court for seeking a declaration that provisions of Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act were violative of the right of citizens guaranteed under the Constitution.

The chief justice of Lahore High Court,after perusing petitioners service record and having noticed that the petitioners had been earning adverse remarks, touching integrity, in their Annual Confidential Reports (ACR), had issued them show- cause notices to explain as to why they should not be dismissed.

The petitioners contended that provisions of the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act, were in violation of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan and against the dictum laid down by superior courts.

They demanded of the Supreme Court to declare the Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act null and void as the tribunal, constituted under section 4 of the Act, was in violation of law and be declared as such.

It was further demanded that provisions of section 3(c) of the Punjab Civil Servants (E&D) Rules, 1999, permitting the authority to dispense with the inquiry of the case, was also in violation of the Constitution, which might also be struck down and be declared illegal, void and against the provisions of the Constitution.

As an interim measure, the petitioners demanded that the show- cause notices issued to them by the LHC be declared illegal and void as, under the High Court West Pakistan Delegation of Power Rules, 1960, only a provincial government was competent to pass such orders.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

MATTERS have worsened in the stand-off between the Azad Kashmir government and the Joint Awami Action Committee,...
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...