ISLAMABAD, Oct 24: Pakistan had been impressing upon the Afghanistan government not to allow Pakistanis to join Afghan forces or get training there.

“Islamabad had also been making efforts to intercept Pakistanis travelling for such an objective to Afghanistan,” foreign office spokesman Riaz Muhammad Khan told a questioner at a press briefing here on Wednesday.

He confirmed that a large number of Pakistanis, who were indicted in the country, had fled to Afghanistan and were required to be handed over to Islamabad by the Afghan government. He said there was no official information here whether there were Pakistanis among persons killed in a recent bombing attack on Afghanistan.

He denied knowledge of any request being made to Pakistani authorities for allowing bodies of eight Pakistanis to be brought back here.

Pakistan has reiterated that it was for peace with India but asserted that it required a political determination on the part of New Delhi what its aim was, as hostile and belligerent statements were frequently being made against Islamabad by senior Indian government leaders, he said.

Pakistan certainly opposed war and favoured a resumption of dialogue for peace. His attention had been drawn to a reported statement of Indian prime minister, asking Pakistan to decide once and for all whether it wanted peace or war.

The FO spokesman said that some prominent Indian (government) personalities had been demanding pro-active policy against Pakistan such as ‘hot pursuit’ and other specific actions. In the present extraordinary circumstances such hostile noises required some robust response from Pakistan to reassure its own people and the President had done that.

But the President had reaffirmed Pakistan’s desire for resumption of dialogue with India. He had also stated one could not clap with one hand and, therefore, for the dialogue to resume, a political determination on the part of India was required, he said.

Riaz Muhammad Khan said that while it was premature on his part to suggest what issues were expected to come up for discussion during the anticipated talks with UN Secretary-General’s special representative Akhdar Ibrahimi later this month, it was assumed that he would be discussing the prospects of a broad-based government and possibly a UN peacekeeping force in the war-torn country following cessation of military operations. The UN official would visit several other regional countries, including Iran.

To a question, he said about 50,000 Afghan refugees had managed to infiltrate into Pakistan over the last several weeks through unguarded routes.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

MATTERS have worsened in the stand-off between the Azad Kashmir government and the Joint Awami Action Committee,...
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...