ISLAMABAD: The disciplinary committee of the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) has stressed the need for concrete efforts to eliminate the menace of rendering professional services by lawyers with the promise of guaranteed results or “done basis” outcomes in exchange for legal fees.

“It is high time for all bar councils of Pakistan to enact rules and regulations in their collective wisdom to eradicate the evil of rendering professional services on a ‘done basis’,” stated a five-page order issued by Supreme Court’s Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, who heads the four-member disciplinary committee of the PBC, the chief regulatory body of lawyers in Pakistan.

The order further emphasised that if action was taken against any lawyer, stern action should also be taken simultaneously against the client, who was equally responsible in the “unscrupulous game”.

The ruling came in a disciplinary complaint filed by Abid Khurshid against his lawyer, Advocate Samina Qureshi, from Bahawalpur.

The complainant alleged that he had engaged Qureshi on the specific condition that she must obtain an injunctive order from the Lahore High Court by all means, failing which she would refund her professional fee.

The complainant claimed that his counsel failed to argue the case on four consecutive hearing dates, thus allowing the construction of Icon Plaza, Model Town, Bahawalpur, to continue.

The counsel, on the other hand, produced LHC order sheets showing that she had appeared on every date and never sought any adjournment.

In his order, Justice Mazhar observed that there was no concept of a “done basis”, “no win, no fee”, or even the incidence of refunding professional fees to a client in the event of failure within the country’s judicial system as well as in the administration of civil and criminal justice.

“The duty of a professional lawyer is to represent [their] client in any court of law competently and skilfully to achieve maximum result, render honest, fair and trustworthy advice, but [they] cannot guarantee victory or an unequivocal outcome by all means or come what may,” the order highlighted.

“If any lawyer vouchsafes or guarantees a fail-safe result, it amounts to unprofessional and unethical conduct, which not only violates the canons of practice but also tarnishes the image and goodwill of the legal profession,” it continued.

Published in Dawn, May 7th, 2026

Editorial

Updated 10 Aug, 2026

Genuine governance

ON the surface, the Punjab cabinet’s decision to allocate funds for local government elections is a welcome step...
10 Aug, 2026

Failed by the state

THE 1,914 cases of child abuse across Pakistan in the first six months of 2026 should spark outrage. The figure ...
10 Aug, 2026

HIV crisis

PAKISTAN’s presence among countries with the fastest-growing HIV epidemic in Asia is a matter of shame. Globally,...
Updated 09 Aug, 2026

Makkah agreement

IN the midst of a gruelling war between the US and Iran — currently at a stalemate — the signing of the Makkah...
09 Aug, 2026

Conflicting priorities

THERE is a reasonable argument that the democratic process must go on regardless of prevailing conditions; that...
09 Aug, 2026

FIFA controversy

FIFA PRESIDENT Gianni Infantino is at the centre of a storm of his own making. Even after a crisis meeting in...