DAWN.COM

Today's Paper | May 07, 2024

Updated 02 Jul, 2022 11:09am

Court rejects request to transfer appeal in couple harassment case

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday rejected a request seeking transfer of the appeal against conviction of Usman Mirza and his accomplices in the couple harassment case.

The trial court on March 24 sentenced Mirza and his four accomplices to life imprisonment.

The sexual harassment case had surfaced in July 2021 after a video went viral showing the convicts maltreating a couple.

Initially, a first information report (FIR) was registered under section 341 (punishment for wrongful restraint), 354A (assault or use of criminal force against woman and stripping her of her clothes), 506 (ii) (punishment for criminal intimidation) and 509 (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) of Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

Later, sections pertaining to rape, sexual abuse, extortion and wrongful confinement were also added to the FIR.

Mothers of Mirza and some other convicts on Friday approached the rostrum and requested IHC Justice Mohsin Akhter Kayani for the transfer of the case, saying earlier the bench had passed an adverse order against the convicts.

Justice Kayani, however, rejected the request and asked the counsel to advance their arguments against the conviction.

In September last year, Additional District and Sessions Judge Ata Rabbani convicted Usman, Shaheen, Attaur Rehman, Adaras Qayyum Butt and Mohib Khan and sentenced them to life imprisonment with a fine of Rs200,000 each.

The victim couple during the cross-examination in January this year retracted from their statement recorded before the magistrate under section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) in which they had accused Usman and his accomplices of sexually abusing, filming and extorting money from them.

As per the 44-page verdict of the trial court, the police, who were the complainant in the case, took the suspects into custody and after registration of the FIR the victims identified them and recorded their statements before the magistrate against them.

Condoning the delay in registration of the FIR, the court stated that this was due to fear and stress and “this reason logically appeals to the common prudence because normally people do hesitate to provide the information promptly to police in such cases where honour and prestige is involved.”

Published in Dawn, July 2nd, 2022

Read Comments

PCB chief announces $100,000 reward for each player if Pakistan wins T20 World Cup Next Story