AMID the din of election rallies, the clash of political workers and scuffles and more over tickets and constituencies, two women from Pakistan’s conservative areas quietly stepped forward and filed nomination papers for the May 11 polls. It was a big step for those two women — Badam Zari from Bajaur and Nusrat Begum from Lower Dir — and an even bigger leap for electoral politics in Pakistan. Indeed the symbolism of the news cannot be highlighted enough. That women were willing to come forward and contest an election from an area where political parties usually collude to prevent female voters from exercising their choice cannot be celebrated enough. At the same time, these two women candidates remind the rest of the country, in fact the entire world, that Pakistan’s tribal areas are not simply synonymous with militancy. Behind the façade of violence, bomb blasts and gun-toting extremists are flesh and blood people who share the same aspirations and dreams as their counterparts elsewhere. And these dreams include exercising their political rights as citizens and women.

However, as Pakistan celebrates the message the nominations of these two women brings — even before it is known what their political message as electoral candidates is — it should not be forgotten that they are still campaigning in areas that are afflicted by violence and militancy where even riches and political influence cannot shield one from harm. As women, Badam Zari and Nusrat Begum are particularly vulnerable to terrorist threats and hence the state must do its best to protect them as they campaign. In fact, the state must provide protection to all other vulnerable candidates — after all, ensuring a free and fair election includes ensuring the equal participation of all candidates and not just those who can afford to keep themselves safe.

But it is not simply the state that needs to be reminded of its due role. Political parties also need to wake up to their responsibilities and do their bit to bring more women into the political mainstream. In this regard, they need to do far more than put together lists of their loyalists for the reserved seats in parliament. Instead, they should be nominating more women on their safe seats. And last but not least, they should be actively mobilising women to vote rather than colluding with each other to keep them away on polling day in parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Fata. Now that would be a giant leap for the political parties, if they would take it.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...