A DECADE earlier the human rights situation in Sindh used to be extremely grim: the police after arresting the accused would often, on trumped-up charges, tie them in chains and hanged them upside down on trees. The feudal lords too would ill-treat their haris/peasants. But now the situation is a lot better.

Now with the emergence of human rights organisations like the HRCP, DCHD and Amnesty International-Pakistan Chapter and the presence of the media and the democratic setup in place (though disrupted and derailed from time to time), the situation has improved to some extent on the above mentioned fronts.

However, domestic violence, discrimination on the basis of gender, caste and creed are still in place and rampant.

More alarmingly, if we have got some respite on the above-mentioned counts, another more dangerous threat has raised its ugly head and is growing and expanding its tentacles rapidly. This is religious extremism and sectarianism.

Two decades ago religious and sectarian tolerance was unmatchable. People and religious scholars would debate on most sensitive issues at public places and with different religious schools of thought.

While rural Sindh and most of the urban Sindh hadn’t seen sectarian violence as witnessed in other parts of the country with horrendous results from time to time, here too the atmosphere is gradually becoming highly charged. People remain extremely cautious while speaking on the issues related to faith.

The fear of being declared heretic or of being accused of blasphemy is in the air. The mystic trappings of Sindh which would keep it highly tolerant are on the verge of being undermined as a majority of the so-called religious scholars, nay hate-speakers who continue to pollute the tender minds, particularly of the youth, are abusing other sects and religions harshly.

Human rights, enlightened political activists and journalists are at high risk of being targeted.

There is an urgent need to train and educate the youth on tolerance and bring the old trained cadre of human rights activists and the new generation of human rights defenders on one platform. This would be a great barrier against the threat of violence which is a direct result of intolerance.

GULSHER PANHWER Johi

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...