In his statement, Kazem Gharibabadi further asserted that the repeated mention of the “60 per cent” uranium enrichment and the “presentation of potential scenarios regarding weapons, without a precise explanation of the legal framework, is more political than technical”.

The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) “does not stipulate a numerical ceiling for enrichment percentages; the legal criterion is the absence of diversion of nuclear materials and activities toward military purposes”, the diplomat highlighted.

“Iran’s nuclear programme has been peaceful, and Iran has acted within the framework of its legal obligations,” he stressed.

Opinion

Editorial

Trump rebuked
Updated 06 Jun, 2026

Trump rebuked

OBSERVERS across the world have long questioned the utility of Donald Trump’s now three-month-old war on Iran. But...
Hostile water motives
06 Jun, 2026

Hostile water motives

INDIA’S latest move to advance the Chenab-Beas Link Tunnel Project and its plan to flush silt from the Salal Dam...
Polio progress
06 Jun, 2026

Polio progress

PAKISTAN’S latest sub-national polio campaign offers encouraging evidence that the country can still push back...
Environment deficit
Updated 05 Jun, 2026

Environment deficit

Pakistan knows all too well the consequences of environmental neglect.
Rights concerns
05 Jun, 2026

Rights concerns

TWO recent news reports have highlighted foreign concerns about the state of human and labour rights in the country....
Patient care crisis
05 Jun, 2026

Patient care crisis

HEALTHCARE in Pakistan is a footnote. Claims by successive governments to introduce vast reforms with huge schemes...