WHILE governments in the West and the Muslim world are being condemned for their overt and covert support to the worst genocide in human history being carried out by Zionist Israel, not much attention is being paid to their similar role in another potential genocidal power waiting in the wings.

India has continuously flouted several United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions to resolve the dispute over occupied Jammu and Kashmir with Pakistan. Besides, India has territorial disputes with China as well over the Tibetan plateau and some part of what India insists on calling Arunachal Pradesh.

It will not be wrong to say that these disputes are highly volatile nuclear flashpoints, because all the three parties to these disputes happen to be nuclear-armed countries.

The International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, a body of Nobel Peace Prize-winning individuals, and the Physicians for Social Respon-sibility, a physician-led body in the United States, released a study in April 2012, predicting that a nuclear war between Pakistan and India would set off a global famine that could kill two billion people, and effectively end human civilisation.

Add to that the possibility of another 1.3 billion people in China being at risk, and that will clearly be the end of civilisation as we know it today.

Even if limited in scope, a conflict with nuclear weapons would contaminate the atmosphere and devastate crop yields, said the report. Who will be responsible for all this? The common factor in the two disputes is India, which in itself is the answer to the question. The UN General Assembly has asked the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague to consider legal consequences for Israel over its continued occupation of Palestinian territories.

The UN should also call on the ICJ to determine all the legal consequences that are arising from the continuing violations by India of the right to self- determination of the Kashmiri people, and the various measures it has taken in recent years aimed at altering the demo- graphic composition, character and status of India-occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

Abid Mahmud Ansari
Islamabad

Published in Dawn, April 16th, 2024

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...