ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani oil firm has won a legal battle against a Bermuda-based company at the International Court of Arbitration, which ruled that Pakistani laws govern the Petroleum Concession Agreements (PCAs) signed in the country.

The Bermuda-based company Frontier Holdings Ltd (FHL) faced defeat in a prolonged legal dispute at the International Court of Arbitration against Petroleum Exploration (Pvt) Ltd (PEL).

The over 80-page arbitration court ruling also marks a pivotal moment in Pakistan’s legal landscape, affirming the country’s legal sovereignty over arbitration agreements related to Petroleum Concession Agreements (PCAs) and Joint Operating Agree­ments (JOAs).

The tribunal declared by a majority that it does not have jurisdiction over this dispute, and FHL will bear the arbitration costs, which were fixed at $250,000.

The legal battle was initiated by FHL, a subsidiary of Canadian company JuraEnergy Corporation, after their dispute with a local partner, PEL, in the Badin North and Badin South blocks, in which FHL holds a 27.5pc share.

The blocks were awarded in 2006 by the Ministry of Petroleum.

The tribunal’s ruling highlights that parties entering into agreements related to PCAs and JOAs in Pakistan must abide by Pakistani laws regarding the legal framework governing their transactions.

Meanwhile, a senior PEL official said the international arbitration was intended to obstruct oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) activities in Pakistan.

The official added that such companies function as non-operators in the E&P sector and have defaulted on their financial obligations towards the government of Paki­stan and key industry players, including OGDCL and Mari Petroleum.

On the other hand, FHL’s chief executive officer has yet to respond despite repeated requests by Dawn to present his point of view on the matter.

Published in Dawn, April 13th, 2024

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...