BERLIN: Germany may allow China’s Cosco to take a smaller stake than originally planned in a Hamburg port terminal, in what an economy ministry source on Tuesday described as an “emergency solution” to approve the deal but mitigate the impact.

Shipping giant Cosco made a bid last year to take a 35 per cent stake in one of logistics firm HHLA’s three terminals in Germany’s largest port, but the German coalition has been divided over whether to let the deal go ahead.

The compromise would see Berlin approving a sale of 24.9pc of the terminal to Cosco, several government sources said. It will be discussed by the cabinet on Wednesday.

The sources said Germany’s economy and foreign ministries still wanted to block the deal entirely but were unlikely to succeed, with Chancellor Olaf Scholz expected to prevail over the objections from other ministers.

“The economy ministry has the position that we should not have Chinese investment in critical infrastructure if possible,” Economy Minister Robert Habeck said in Luxemburg on Tuesday on the sidelines of the EU energy ministers’ meeting.

The German government has not agreed on a joint position yet, Habeck added.

HHLA declined comment and a Cosco representative was not immediately available for comment.

How the government handles the matter is seen as a gauge of how far Germany is willing to toughen its stance on China, its top trading partner, due to concerns about being overly dependent on the increasingly assertive authoritarian country.

The news comes a week before Scholz is due to travel to China.

Supporters of the deal say it will allow Hamburg, where Scholz was mayor before becoming chancellor, to keep pace with rival ports that are also vying for Chinese trade and some of which are partly owned by Cosco.

“The federal government departments involved see a limit to 24.9pc as an ‘emergency solution’ to prevent worse things from happening,” the economy ministry source said, adding a smaller stake would give Cosco less say in running the terminal.

“Of course, this does not solve the actual risk issues, so the departments continue to believe that a complete ban is the right way to go,” the source said.

A second source said the government could try to attach additional guarantees to the deal to further mitigate Cosco’s influence on the running of the port terminal.

“Of course it’s now up to Cosco to say we’re also happy with 24.9pc,” a third source said.

Beijing has previously said it hoped Germany would view the deal in an “objective and rational light” without politicising economic relations.

Published in Dawn, October 26th, 2022

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...