IHC issues notice to Rehman Malik on US blogger’s plea

Published August 22, 2020
Cynthia D. Ritchie has challenged dismissal of her petition seeking registration of rape case against the senator. — Facebook/File
Cynthia D. Ritchie has challenged dismissal of her petition seeking registration of rape case against the senator. — Facebook/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Friday issued a notice to Senator Rehman Malik on an appeal filed by US blogger Cynthia D. Ritchie against dismissal of her plea seeking registration of a criminal case against Senator Malik over rape allegations.

Through the notice, Justice Aamer Farooq sought reply from Senator Malik by the first week of September.

An additional district and sessions judge had on Aug 5 dismissed a petition of Ms Ritchie seeking registration of a rape case against Senator Malik after a police report termed the complaint baseless.

The police report stated that Ms Ritchie had neither produced any evidence to corroborate the allegation of rape nor had she placed any material on record to show that she had been harassed.

Cynthia has challenged dismissal of her petition seeking registration of rape case against the senator

In her application filed with the Secretariat police station on June 17, Ms Ritchie accused Mr Malik of raping her at his residence in 2011. She also stated that the former interior minister in connivance with former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani had employed the Pakistan Peoples Party media cell to intimidate, threaten, harass and defame her on social media.

The police in response to the court order submitted a report stating that Ms Richie had not filed any complaint with the police station regarding her rape allegations back in 2011. The police also maintained that no medical report had been attached with the application as evidence to prove that she had been raped. The report termed the stance of Ms Ritchie doubtful in the absence of substantial evidence and inadequate for registration of an FIR as the police found no truth in it.

In the appeal against dismissal of her plea by the sessions court, Ms Ritchie stated that Senator Malik had committed “heinous cognizable offence” but “no action whatsoever, was taken by police”.

She stated that Senator Malik “is trying to hide under the grab of civil controversy which by no means entitles the accused persons to commit heinous cognizable offences”.

She requested the high court to set aside the order for dismissal of her plea and issue directive for the police to register an FIR against Rehman Malik.

Published in Dawn, August 22nd, 2020

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...