PESHAWAR: The Fata ad hoc lecturers on Thursday ended the nine days long sit-in after the government promised to regularise their services.

Ad hoc Lecturers Association president Afsar Khan told reporters at the Peshawar Press Club that higher education minister Mushtaq Ahmad Ghani and public health engineering minister Shah Farman visited the camp of protesters and assured them all of service regularisation within a week.

“We, the teachers, staged a sit-in for nine days against the delay in regularisation of our services but now, the provincial government has promised to resolve our demand. In this light, continuing with the protest is not appropriate,” he said.

Accompanied by other lecturers including Pakhtunkhwa College Teachers Association president Nasrullah, Mr. Afsar said contractual employees in other departments had been regularised but unfortunately, the 213 ad hoc lecturers of Fata including 100 women were denied service regularisation.


Ministers assure protesters of service regularisation within a week


“The two ministers assured us that a summary regarding regularisation of our services will be forwarded to the chief minister within a week for approval,” he said.

The teacher leader said the protest was ended in light of the minister’s assurance.

“A total of 213 lecturers including 100 women have long been performing duty on ad hoc basis in various parts of Fata. They are stressed out for not being regularised,” he said.

Mr. Afsar said a high-level meeting on Feb 16 had discussed the matter in detail and recommended the regularisation of the ad hoc teachers’ services to the chief minister.

On the occasion, the Pakhtunkhwa College Teachers Association president complained Fata teachers diligently performed duty in their respective areas despite the delicate law and order situation but the government was indifferent to their call for service regularisation.

He also said it was unfortunate that educational institutions in the province had yet to be given foolproof security.

Published in Dawn, February 19th, 2016

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...