Malaysian Airlines may revamp image after air disasters

Published July 29, 2014
The two air disasters has left Malaysian Airlines with 537 fatalities for the year 2014. -File Photo
The two air disasters has left Malaysian Airlines with 537 fatalities for the year 2014. -File Photo

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian Airlines may seek a name change in an attempt to rebrand itself following two aviation disasters over a period of four months, which has left the airline in dire straits.

The Independent reported that, “Since the disappearance of flight MH370 in March and the missile attack on MH17 over Ukraine shares have been down 35 per cent so far this year as investors fear for the firm’s future.

Facing financial collapse due to the twin tragedies of MH370 and MH17, the airline, which is majority-owned by the Malaysian government, has decided to review its strategy by seeking investment from other airlines in an attempt to rebuild its image.

A possible future course of action may include a new name for the airline, a restructuring of its 20,000 staff and new flight routes.

“Our majority shareholder, the Malaysian government, has already started a process of assessing the future shape of our business and that process will now be speeded up as a result of MH17,” the airline’s commercial director Hugh Dunleavy told the Telegraph.

“Airlines such as ours should be left to focus on the quality of our product in the air, not on the air corridor we fly in, which should be guaranteed as safe passage,” said Dunleavy.

The two air disasters has left the airline with 537 fatalities for the year 2014, more than twice the total amount that other airlines faced the previous year.

Bloomberg estimated that the airline will lose more than 1 billion ringgit this year dues to costs and passengers flight cancellations. The airline carries an estimated 50,000 passengers a day.

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Merging for what?

Merging for what?

The concern is that if the government is thinking of cutting costs through the merger, we might even lose the functionality levels we currently have.

Editorial

Dubai properties
Updated 16 May, 2024

Dubai properties

It is hoped that any investigation that is conducted will be fair and that no wrongdoing will be excused.
In good faith
16 May, 2024

In good faith

THE ‘P’ in PTI might as well stand for perplexing. After a constant yo-yoing around holding talks, the PTI has...
CTDs’ shortcomings
16 May, 2024

CTDs’ shortcomings

WHILE threats from terrorist groups need to be countered on the battlefield through military means, long-term ...
Reserved seats
Updated 15 May, 2024

Reserved seats

The ECP's decisions and actions clearly need to be reviewed in light of the country’s laws.
Secretive state
15 May, 2024

Secretive state

THERE is a fresh push by the state to stamp out all criticism by using the alibi of protecting national interests....
Plague of rape
15 May, 2024

Plague of rape

FLAWED narratives about women — from being weak and vulnerable to provocative and culpable — have led to...