Economic policymakers have been prudent in setting for next year a modest growth target of 4.8pc.
It is clear that the revival of and rise in economic growth is becoming a concept
alien to the IMF.
How do we ensure growth revival built on a sustainable, efficient and stable foundation?
The time of reckoning is fast approaching; the govt must deliver on its promises with less than two and a half years left.
The Fund needs to realise that ordinary people are struggling.
It is worrying that the IMF programme has begun to stall.
The government should adopt a three-month flexible rolling budget for next year.
The biggest challenge is the distress of the poor.
The government’s efforts should be concentrated on easing the constraints faced by exporters.
It appears that the IMF has underestimated the impact of stabilisation on poverty.
Pakistan must undertake far-reaching, decisive economic reforms beyond those envisaged under the IMF programme.
The targets and pace of economic reforms the government has set are formidable.
An agreement, based on realistic terms, should be struck soon.
Should we not welcome the fact that the government did not sign an IMF agreement on terms it felt were harsh?
Any stabilisation programme must be implemented at a bearable pace, not one that results in economic mayhem.
The current state of economic affairs requires that some important decisions be taken.
The budget has done little to address the macroeconomic imbalance.
The perception of Pakistan’s economy is a damaging indictment of our current system.
Facing an election year, will this government behave any differently from its predecessors?
Why did Pakistan become an undervalued economy? Why the sudden interest in taking advantage of the situation?