LAHORE: Supreme Court Bar Association President Syed Ali Zafar told the Lahore High Court on Tuesday that Orange Line Metro Train project could be stopped if the court found it contrary to law and fundamental rights of the citizens.

Advancing his arguments being amicus curiae (friend of court) during hearing of a number of petitions against the train project, Mr Zafar stated before the division bench that it was right of the government to construct and develop public infrastructure in a city to meet the people’s demands.

He said it was not for the court to stop the government from planning, expansion and development of infrastructure and it was an established fact that the courts did not interfere in policy matters.

However, he said, there were three clogs on the right of the government to undertake an urban planning project and in all three situations the court was obligated to stop such a scheme.

He explained that the court could stop any development project if found contrary to the Constitution/law, fundamental rights and if the urban development violated basic and desirable features of an existing urban fabric because the principle was that that a vibrant existing urban fabric was connected to the “right of life”.

The bar president stated that the court had to examine whether Orange Line Metro Train project violated any law or any fundamental right or was against the basic urban fabric of the city of Lahore.

He said the original plan of the project was designed as an underground and not overhead track. He said the overhead track was more feasible in countries like Dubai or in areas where its monstrosities would not affect basic structure of the city.

He quoted example of the UK where for more than 150 years the passenger trains were running underground. Similar projects had also been undertaken in Delhi, Rome, Paris, he added.

Mr Zafar pointed out that there were laws, which deal with the matter and if the impugned project contravened these laws then the court had the power to stop the government from undertaking the project.

He said the Antiquities Act, 1975 clearly specified that all monuments, objects and sites of historical interest were protected from any damage, which also imposed a duty on the government to preserve and protect them.

He said the Act also did not allow any construction or development within an area of 200 feet where a protected monument or antiquity was located.

He maintained that if Orange Line Metro Train would harm any antiquity, there was no question of giving any permission for the construction.

The bench headed by Justice Abid Aziz Sheikh adjourned hearing till Wednesday (today) for further arguments.

Published in Dawn, January 27th, 2016

Opinion

Budgeting without people

Budgeting without people

Even though the economy is a critical issue, discussions about it involve a select few who are not really interested in communicating with the people.

Editorial

Iranian tragedy
Updated 21 May, 2024

Iranian tragedy

Due to Iran’s regional and geopolitical influence, the world will be watching the power transition carefully.
Circular debt woes
21 May, 2024

Circular debt woes

THE alleged corruption and ineptitude of the country’s power bureaucracy is proving very costly. New official data...
Reproductive health
21 May, 2024

Reproductive health

IT is naïve to imagine that reproductive healthcare counts in Pakistan, where women from low-income groups and ...
Wheat price crash
Updated 20 May, 2024

Wheat price crash

What the government has done to Punjab’s smallholder wheat growers by staying out of the market amid crashing prices is deplorable.
Afghan corruption
20 May, 2024

Afghan corruption

AMONGST the reasons that the Afghan Taliban marched into Kabul in August 2021 without any resistance to speak of ...
Volleyball triumph
20 May, 2024

Volleyball triumph

IN the last week, while Pakistan’s cricket team savoured a come-from-behind T20 series victory against Ireland,...