ISLAMABAD: The federal government concluded its arguments in the houbara bustard case on Wednesday, with the attorney general (AG) asking the Supreme Court to allow “sustainable hunting” of the bird.

A five-judge larger bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali is hearing the federal and provincial governments’ review petition against the Aug 19 verdict of the apex court, which banned the hunting of the endangered bird.

AG Salman Aslam Butt told the court that the government did not want the order set aside in its entirety, just that the ban should not be perpetual.

Objecting to para 23 of the Aug 19 judgment, the law officer stated that the top court could not direct the federal and provincial governments to legislate a ban on the hunting of the houbara bustard.

Arguments of other stakeholders in this case will continue until Thursday.

On Oct 17, 2015, the federal government adopted the stance that falconry was a significant feature of Pakistan’s relations with Middle Eastern countries and that inviting Arab dignitaries to hunt in Pakistan was a “corner stone of foreign policy”.

The federal government had also reminded the court that the judiciary usually avoided interfering in the executive’s affairs.

On Dec 10, a three-judge bench consisting of Justice Saqib Nisar, Justice Qazi Faez Isa and Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed recommended that the chief justice constitute a larger bench to hear appeals against the ban. Justice Isa objected to the majority suggestion and wrote a five-page note of dissent.

Published in Dawn, January 7th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

A breakthrough?
07 May, 2026

A breakthrough?

The whole world would welcome an end to this pointless war.
Missed opportunity
07 May, 2026

Missed opportunity

A BIG opportunity to industrialise Pakistan has just passed us by. This has been reconfirmed by the investment...
Punishing dissent
07 May, 2026

Punishing dissent

THE Sindh government’s treatment of the Aurat March this week was a disgraceful assault on democratic rights. What...
The May war
Updated 06 May, 2026

The May war

Rationality demands that both states come to the table and discuss their grievances, and their solutions in a mature manner.
Looking inwards
06 May, 2026

Looking inwards

REGULAR appraisals by human rights groups and activists should not be treated by the authorities as attempts to ...
Feeling the heat
06 May, 2026

Feeling the heat

ANOTHER heatwave season has begun, and once again, the state is scrambling to respond to conditions it has long been...