Only ECP has authority to delimit constituencies: SC

Published November 6, 2015
It is clear that the government can only determine the number of union councils, not delimitation, ECP argues.—AFP/File
It is clear that the government can only determine the number of union councils, not delimitation, ECP argues.—AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that the authority to delimit the number of union councils and wards for local government elections was vested only in the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

“The power to delimit the constituencies lies with the ECP,” said a three-judge bench headed by Justice Mian Saqib Nisar.

The bench had taken up a petition jointly filed by the ECP, De-Limitation Authority Rawalpindi Division and de-limitation officer/deputy election commissioner Rawalpindi district against the Oct 1 judgment of the Lahore High Court’s Rawalpindi bench setting aside the delimitation of union councils of Rawalpindi division carried out for the LG elections scheduled for Dec 3.

Also read: SC urged to overturn LHC verdict on delimitation in Rawalpindi

The high court had issued the order on identical challenges to the delimitation exercise filed by 19 petitioners, including former Murree UC nazims Sajid Abbasi and Arshad Nawaz. Former Murree nazim Haroon Abbasi and others had also challenged the delimitation of Jawa, Ghora Gali and other areas.

The petitioners represented by senior counsel Shafqat Abbasi argued that the delimitation was carried out on the basis of population of 12,000, but in many cases the present exercise had been done in the constituency which had a population of 19,000.

The Supreme Court observed that the high court had failed to address the question raised against the delimitation of constituencies and remanded the case back to the high court.

The apex court ordered the registrar of the high court to fix the case before the relevant bench in the third week of November so that it could decide the matter within two weeks even if it had to constitute a special bench for the purpose.

In its appeal, the ECP argued that the high court judge had misinterpreted the provisions of the Punjab Local Government Act (PLGA) 2013. It said that section 8(2) of PLGA provided that after demarcation of the local bodies and determination of the union councils and wards it was the ECP which would delimit the UCs and wards.

The commission said the high court had failed to properly comprehend the scheme of the election prescribed by the law since the only power vested with the government under section 7 was to determine the number of union councils in a metropolitan corporation, a municipal corporation, a district council and wards of a municipal committee.

“Thus it is clear that the government can only determine the number of union councils, but delimitation is to be carried out by the ECP,” it said.

Published in Dawn, November 6th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.