Samjhota Express

Published October 13, 2015

I WAS devastated on reading the news on Saturday that the Indian railway authorities did not permit the Samjhota Express to cross into India from the Wagah border on Friday morning on the plea that there was unrest in Indian Punjab due to “farmers’ agitation” and they feared for the safety of the train.

Did they realise to what financial, physical and mental stress the passengers and their friends/relatives were subjected to?

This meant that the passegers were stranded at Lahore from Friday to Monday morning when the Samjhota Express was next scheduled to leave Lahore for Attari border station in India.

All the passengers were presumably from the lower income group and they had certainly not even imagined that they would have to bear this extra expenditure. How they would bear the expenses of three days’ board and lodging?

Their friends and relatives in far-off towns must have already left their hometowns for the Delhi railway station to receive them. What would happen to them ? Would they stay in Delhi for the next three days and bear the expenses of board and lodging? If so, how would they meet these extra expenses?

They might have not brought extra money with them to meet this extra and unforeseen expenditure. Or they were supposed to return to their hometowns and come again after three days. Some of the passengers might have been going to attend some specific functions immediately on their arrival in India — for exapmle, a wedding. The purpose of their visit was evidently thwarted.

Did the Indian railway authorities take into account these painful realities before being cowed down?

If somehow they felt apprehensions for the safety of the Samjhota Express, it was easy to break the train and attach its bogies to the various trains leaving Amritsar for Delhi.

One bogie in one train would have been too inconspicuous to be taken note of by the rioters.

Justice (r) Salahuddin Mirza
Karachi

Published in Dawn, October 13th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...