Warren Buffett losing some mojo on his economic ‘moats’

Published May 3, 2015
Warren Buffett — Reuters
Warren Buffett — Reuters

NEW YORK: Warren Buffett has carved out a core stock-picking strategy of investing in companies with strong economic “moats”, businesses that have built, fortified and generated success from well-known brands that make it difficult for them to succumb to competitive forces.

But for a number of holdings in his stock portfolio, the moats may be drying up and the walls could be breached.

Stalwarts like International Business Machines, Coca-Cola Inc, Procter & Gamble Co to name a few have showed declining revenue trends in recent years, and face competition that may make it more difficult for them to outperform the market in the way they did in the past.

When Berkshire Hathaway, the conglomerate Buffett has run since 1965, releases quarterly results on Friday — which will follow with his annual gathering in Omaha, Nebraska — it is likely to show that his largest equity-market positions trailed the broad-market Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.

On average, the 15 biggest positions he owned at the end of 2014 have gained 7.8 per cent in the last 12 months, compared with a 13.1pc rise for the S&P.

Buffett supporters — and there are many — would say that the 84-year-old investor is hardly looking at the short term, but what stands out about some of the larger holdings are weakening revenue trends that augur for concern about the long-term, not just the short term.

“The moats are not as deep and unimpenetrable as in the past,” said Doug Kass, who runs Seabreeze Investment Partners in Palm Beach, Florida, and has questioned Buffett’s investments in the past. He currently has no position in the stock.

That is not to say Buffett is any kind of a slouch. Those 15 holdings, over the last five years, on average, are ahead of the S&P, with an average gain of 85pc, compared with the S&P’s 78pc rise.

And he can still be opportunistic, as in the aftermath of the financial crisis when he acquired a $750m position in Goldman Sachs Group Inc that’s now worth $2.5bn, and an option to buy 700m shares in Bank of America Corp for $5bn — now worth $11.2bn.

Published in Dawn, May 3rd, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...