AS European leaders engage in shuttle diplomacy to still the armed conflict in eastern Ukraine, Crimea, where the Russian onslaught began almost a year ago, has become all but forgotten. It isn’t the subject of any talks, and the international sanctions imposed on Russia for annexing the Ukrainian peninsula are light compared to the ones stemming from later phases of the conflict. Yet Crimea provides a key to understanding the crisis and its potential resolution: ultimately, it’s all about how the people in disputed areas see both Russia and Ukraine.

Ukrainian political scientist Taras Berezovets, a Crimea native, recently started an initiative he called Free Crimea, aided by the Canada Fund for Local Initiatives and aimed at building Ukrainian soft power on the peninsula. To establish a starting point, he started by commissioning a poll of Crimean residents from the Ukrainian branch of Germany’s biggest market research organization, GfK. The poll results were something of a cold shower to Berezovets. GfK Ukraine’s poll was not based on actual field work, which is understandable, since a Ukraine- based organisation would have a tough time operating in today’s Crimea, which is rife with Russian FSB secret police agents and ruled by a local government intent on keeping dissent to a minimum.

Instead, it conducted a telephone poll of 800 people in Crimea. The calls were made on Jan 16-22 to people living in towns with a population of 20,000 or more, which probably led to the peninsula’s native population, the Tatars, being underrepresented because many of them live in small villages. On the other hand, no calls were placed in Sevastopol, the most pro-Russian city in Crimea. Even with these limitations, it was the most representative independent poll taken on the peninsula since its annexation.

Eighty-two per cent of those polled said they fully supported Crimea’s inclusion in Russia, and another 11pc expressed partial support. Only 4pc spoke out against it.

Berezovets is inclined to credit Crimea’s “Orwellian atmosphere” for some of that near-unanimity. He’s probably right. Given the ubiquitous FSB attention and the arrest of some pro-Ukrainian activists — the persecution of film-maker Oleg Sentsov is the cause celebre — as “extremists”, few people are likely to be brave enough to condemn the annexation on the phone, especially when the caller is a stranger.

In Russia itself, polls show 85pc support for Putin, but it’s hard to calculate how much of that is motivated by caution: it’s best to treat those numbers as an indication that most people are willing to acquiesce than to protest.

Yet answers to other, more neutral questions show Crimeans are not interested in going back to Ukraine.

Fifty-one per cent reported their well-being had improved in the past year. That especially concerns retirees, who started receiving much higher Russian pensions.

Crimeans’ year of upheaval has made them sophisticated news consumers: They have learned to reject the propaganda flying at them from all sides. Eighty per cent say Ukrainian coverage of their region is all or mostly lies. While 84pc watch Russian television from time to time, only 10pc say they trust it. Social networks have become the most trusted source of information: 29pc say they rely on them.

The armed conflict in eastern Ukraine was the biggest worry for 42pc of respondents. It’s more important to them than inflation, which 40pc of the respondents named, or the peninsula’s de facto transport blockade by Ukraine, which worries 22pc of those asked.

Taken together, these answers suggest that a majority of Crimeans see Ukraine as a poor and unstable country where the media are hostile toward them. That’s largely an accurate assessment that has nothing to do with fear or brainwashing from Moscow. All things considered, Ukraine is not at this point a welcoming alternative to Russia.

Legal and diplomatic matters aside, people want to live in countries that they see as wealthy, non-threatening and protective of them. It’s hard to imagine anyone thinking of today’s Russia in these terms, but people’s thinking is often relative. That’s why, according to Russian data, 850,000 people from Ukraine’s eastern regions have fled across the border. Fewer refugees — 610,174 people — chose to resettle in other parts of Ukraine.

Kiev’s claims on Crimea and the rebel-held areas are legally indisputable, and the March 2014 referendum that Russia used as justification for Crimea’s annexation was a half-hearted imitation of a ballot carried out in the sights of Russian guns. Still, Ukraine has a long way to go before people in these areas actually want to be governed from Kiev.

A year after what Ukrainians call their “revolution of dignity”, many of them appear to believe even Moscow is preferable. Propaganda can’t solve this problem: it takes money, political will and a friendly attitude toward wary, disillusioned citizens.

By arrangement with Bloomberg-The Washington Post

Published in Dawn February 8th , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.