ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court will take up on Tuesday a case related to implementation of directives outlined by it through its June 19 verdict on minority rights.

Headed by Chief Justice Nasir-ul-Mulk, the three-judge bench includes Justice Gulzar Ahmad and Justice Mushir Alam. Attorney General Salman Aslam Butt will appear on court notice to explain measures taken by the government to ensure rights of the minorities.

The court has already summoned reports from the federal government after different departments failed to comply with earlier reminders issued by the Supreme Court human rights cell on Nov 10 to important government offices to furnish updates on the implementation of the June 19 verdict.

It is also expected that during the proceedings the court may also discuss the Nov 6 horrendous incident where a Christian couple was lynched by a mob in Kot Radha Kishan, some 60km southwest of Lahore, over alleged blasphemy.

A set of guidelines were issued on a suo motu by former chief justice Tassaduq Hussain Jillani through a 32-page judgment in a bid to promote culture of religious and social tolerance by developing appropriate curricula at the school and college levels, besides constituting a task force for developing a strategy of religious tolerance and establishing a special police force with professional training to protect places of worship of minorities.

The notice was taken against the backdrop of the bomb attack on a church in Peshawar in which 81 people died on Sept 22 last year.

During the proceedings, the court also received complaints from Hindus seeking its directive for remedial measures so that their places of worship are protected. Other complaints related to threat to proselytise Kalash tribe and Ismailis in Chitral, coercion of Hindu girls to convert to a different sect within Islam or to face death, registration of marriages of minorities, etc.

The court had also ordered its office to open a separate file, to be placed before a three-judge bench in future, to ensure that the June 19 verdict was given effect in letter and spirit and the bench so formed could also entertain complaints or petitions relatable to violation of fundamental rights of minorities.

The June 19 verdict had asked the federal government to constitute a task force to develop a strategy of religious tolerance, besides taking appropriate steps to ensure that hate speeches in social media were discouraged and the delinquents were brought to justice.

Published in Dawn, November 25th , 2014

Opinion

In defamation’s name

In defamation’s name

It provides yet more proof that the undergirding logic of public authority in Pakistan is legal and extra-legal coercion rather than legitimised consent.

Editorial

Mercury rising
Updated 27 May, 2024

Mercury rising

Each of the country's leaders is equally responsible for the deep pit Pakistan seems to have fallen into.
Antibiotic overuse
27 May, 2024

Antibiotic overuse

ANTIMICROBIAL resistance is an escalating crisis claiming some 700,000 lives annually in Pakistan. It is the third...
World Cup team
27 May, 2024

World Cup team

PAKISTAN waited until the very end to name their T20 World Cup squad. Even then, there was last-minute drama. Four...
ICJ rebuke
Updated 26 May, 2024

ICJ rebuke

The reason for Israel’s criminal behaviour is that it is protected by its powerful Western friends.
Hot spells
26 May, 2024

Hot spells

WITH Pakistan already dealing with a heatwave that has affected 26 districts since May 21, word from the climate...
Defiant stance
26 May, 2024

Defiant stance

AT a time when the country is in talks with the IMF for a medium-term loan crucial to bolstering the fragile ...