IN your issue of Nov 22 you have rightly pointed out that the crime of 2007 was merely a subsidiary crime whereas it was the crime of 1999 which was the original and basic crime from which emanated the crime of 2007.

As such, if at all Musharraf is to be tried, he should be tried for the basic crime of 1999. If this is done, the crime of 2007 will automatically form part of the charge framed against him.

I have always held, and you have rightly said so, that all the abettors should be tried as co-accused — both in civilian and military set-ups, including the members of parliament who endorsed the original crime.

It goes without saying that Musharraf alone could not have dared to topple the constitutionally established government if the army had refused to support the 1999 coup and, later, the political class had refused to endorse his treacherous actions.

Salahuddin Mirza

Karachi

Published in Dawn, November 23th , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Large projects again?
Updated 03 Jun, 2024

Large projects again?

Government must focus on debt sustainability by curtailing its spending and mobilising more resources.
Local power
03 Jun, 2024

Local power

A SIGNIFICANT policy paper was recently debated at an HRCP gathering, calling for the constitutional protection of...
Child-friendly courts
03 Jun, 2024

Child-friendly courts

IN a country where the child rights debate has been a belated one, it is heartening to note that a recent Supreme...
Dutch courage
Updated 02 Jun, 2024

Dutch courage

ECP has been supported wholeheartedly in implementing twisted interpretations of democratic process by some willing collaborators in the legislature.
New World cricket
02 Jun, 2024

New World cricket

HAVING finished as semi-finalists and runners-up in the last two editions of the T20 World Cup in familiar ...
Dead on arrival?
02 Jun, 2024

Dead on arrival?

Whatever the motivations for Gaza peace plan, it is difficult to see the scheme succeeding.