ISLAMABAD: The Natio­nal Accountability Bureau (NAB), Rawalpindi, filed a supplementary reference on Monday regarding the Rs7.5 billion Modaraba — a mode of Islamic investment — scam unearthed last year.

The supplementary reference was filed in Accountability Court Rawalpindi against Mufti Ehsanul Haq, the chief executive officer of Fayyazi Industries Gujranwala, and 35 others on charges of corruption, corrupt practices and cheating the public at large.

The regional bureau has received more than 9,100 claims in the case.

Talking to Dawn, NAB spokesman Mohammad Irfan said the supplementary reference had been filed because more affected people had come forward and filed their claims.

He said the number of the accused had been increased as 29 more accused had been enlisted in the supplementary reference.

“The filing of supplementary reference was necessary to expand the scope of investigation and accommodate those victims who recently contacted NAB and informed it that they had also invested in this Modaraba,” he said.

The NAB official said newly enrolled 1,100 victims had invested an amount of over Rs1bn in the business.

Published in Dawn, October 21st , 2014

Opinion

Editorial

Impending slaughter
Updated 07 May, 2024

Impending slaughter

Seven months into the slaughter, there are no signs of hope.
Wheat investigation
07 May, 2024

Wheat investigation

THE Shehbaz Sharif government is in a sort of Catch-22 situation regarding the alleged wheat import scandal. It is...
Naila’s feat
07 May, 2024

Naila’s feat

IN an inspirational message from the base camp of Nepal’s Mount Makalu, Pakistani mountaineer Naila Kiani stressed...
Plugging the gap
06 May, 2024

Plugging the gap

IN Pakistan, bias begins at birth for the girl child as discriminatory norms, orthodox attitudes and poverty impede...
Terrains of dread
Updated 06 May, 2024

Terrains of dread

Restored faith in the police is unachievable without political commitment and interprovincial support.
Appointment rules
Updated 06 May, 2024

Appointment rules

If the judiciary had the power to self-regulate, it ought to have exercised it instead of involving the legislature.